Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22344268›Full record

ArticleMethods of information in medicine2012

Identification of breast cancer prognosis markers using integrative sparse boosting.

S Ma, J Huang, Y Xie, N Yi

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Methods of information in medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S MaSchool of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven CT 06520, USA. Shuangge.ma@yale.edu
J Huang
Y Xie
N Yi

Funding

Bayesian Methods for Mapping Complex Epistatic GenesR01GM069430 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI YI, NENGJUN · 2005 to 2013
$2.3M
Predicting Adjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Lung CancerR01CA152301 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI XIE, YANG · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
Novel Methods for Integrative Analysis of Cancer Genomic DataR01CA142774 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MA, SHUANGGE · 2010 to 2013
$1.3M
Regularized Classification & Survival Analysis for Expression Profiling of CancerR01CA120988 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HUANG, JIAN · 2008 to 2011
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA120988NCI NIH HHS CA142774NCI NIH HHS CA152301NCI NIH HHS R01 CA120988NCI NIH HHS R01 CA142774NCI NIH HHS R01 CA152301NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM069430
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn breast cancer research, it is important to identify genomic markers associated with prognosis. Multiple microarray gene expression profiling studies have been conducted, searching for prognosis markers. Genomic markers identified from the analysis of single datasets often suffer a lack of reproducibility because of small sample sizes. Integrative analysis of data from multiple independent studies has a larger sample size and may provide a cost-effective solution.

methodsWe collect four breast cancer prognosis studies with gene expression measurements. An accelerated failure time (AFT) model with an unknown error distribution is adopted to describe survival. An integrative sparse boosting approach is employed for marker selection. The proposed model and boosting approach can effectively accommodate heterogeneity across multiple studies and identify genes with consistent effects.

resultsSimulation study shows that the proposed approach outperforms alternatives including meta-analysis and intensity approaches by identifying the majority or all of the true positives, while having a low false positive rate. In the analysis of breast cancer data, 44 genes are identified as associated with prognosis. Many of the identified genes have been previously suggested as associated with tumorigenesis and cancer prognosis. The identified genes and corresponding predicted risk scores differ from those using alternative approaches. Monte Carlo-based prediction evaluation suggests that the proposed approach has the best prediction performance.

conclusionsIntegrative analysis may provide an effective way of identifying breast cancer prognosis markers. Markers identified using the integrative sparse boosting analysis have sound biological implications and satisfactory prediction performance.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorGene Expression ProfilingBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMicroarray AnalysisModels, StatisticalMonte Carlo MethodPrognosisStatistics as TopicBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID22344268
PMCPMC3598607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.