ArticlePharmacogenetics and genomics2012
The limits of genome-wide methods for pharmacogenomic testing.
Article in Pharmacogenetics and genomics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacogenomic landscape of the Thai population from genome sequencing of 949 individuals.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Co-Occurring Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Metabolomics: A Tool to Envisage Biomarkers in Clinical Interpretation of Cancer.Current drug research reviews · 2024Review
- PharmVIP: A Web-Based Tool for Pharmacogenomic Variant Analysis and Interpretation.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- The need to shift pharmacogenetic research from candidate gene to genome-wide association studies.Pharmacogenomics · 2021Article
- PharmaKU: A Web-Based Tool Aimed at Improving Outreach and Clinical Utility of Pharmacogenomics.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- Genetic epidemiology of pharmacogenetic variants in South East Asian Malays using whole-genome sequences.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2017Article
- Transcriptomic variation of pharmacogenes in multiple human tissues and lymphoblastoid cell lines.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2017Article
- Metabolomics Applications in Precision Medicine: An Oncological Perspective.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2017Review
- DMET™ (Drug Metabolism Enzymes and Transporters): a pharmacogenomic platform for precision medicine.Oncotarget · 2016Review
- Emerging applications of metabolomics in drug discovery and precision medicine.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2016Review
- An integrated analysis tool for analyzing hybridization intensities and genotypes using new-generation population-optimized human arrays.BMC genomics · 2016Article
- CYP2A6 genotyping methods and strategies using real-time and end point PCR platforms.Pharmacogenomics · 2016Article
- Population-based in vitro hazard and concentration-response assessment of chemicals: the 1000 genomes high-throughput screening study.Environmental health perspectives · 2015Article
- Challenges to integrating pharmacogenetic testing into medication therapy management.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2015Review
- Whole genome sequencing in pharmacogenomics.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2015Article
- Pharmacogenomics in children: advantages and challenges of next generation sequencing applications.International journal of pediatrics · 2013Article
- Moving away from candidate genes: a 'genome-wise' discovery of gemcitabine myelotoxicity.Pharmacogenomics · 2012Article
- Genome-wide approaches in pharmacogenomics: heritability estimation and pharmacoethnicity as primary challenges.Pharmacogenomics · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe goal of pharmacogenomics is the translation of genomic discoveries into individualized patient care. Recent advances in the means to survey human genetic variation are fundamentally transforming our understanding of the genetic basis of interindividual variation in therapeutic response. The goal of this study was to systematically evaluate high-throughput genotyping technologies for their ability to assay variation in pharmacogenetically important genes (pharmacogenes). These platforms are either being proposed for or are already being widely used for clinical implementation; therefore, knowledge of coverage of pharmacogenes on these platforms would serve to better evaluate current or proposed pharmacogenetic association studies.
methodAmong the genes included in our study are drug-metabolizing enzymes, transporters, receptors, and drug targets, of interest to the entire pharmacogenetic community. We considered absolute and linkage disequilibrium (LD)-informed coverage, minor allele frequency spectrum, and functional annotation for a Caucasian population. We also examined the effect of LD, effect size, and cohort size on the power to detect single nucleotide polymorphism associations.
resultsIn our analysis of 253 pharmacogenes, we found that no platform showed more than 85% coverage of these genes (after accounting for LD). Furthermore, the lack of coverage showed a marked increase at minor allele frequencies of less than 20%. Even after accounting for LD, only 30% of the missense polymorphisms (which are enriched for low-frequency alleles) were covered by HapMap, with still lower coverage on the other platforms.
conclusionWe have conducted the first systematic evaluation of the Axiom Genomic Database, Omni 2.5 M, and the Drug Metabolizing Enzymes and Transporters chip. This study is the first to utilize the 1000 Genomes Project to present a comprehensive evaluative framework. Our results provide a much-needed assessment of microarray-based genotyping and next-generation sequencing technologies' ability to survey fully the variation in genes of particular interest to the pharmacogenetics community. Our findings demonstrate the limitations of genome-wide methods and the challenges of implementing pharmacogenomic tests into the clinical context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.