Trial reportBone marrow transplantation2012
Efficacy and safety of hematopoietic stem cell remobilization with plerixafor+G-CSF in adult patients with germ cell tumors.
Trial report in Bone marrow transplantation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes of upfront plerixafor use for mobilization in germ cell tumor patients.Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy · 2024Article
- Hematopoietic stem cell mobilization strategies to support high-dose chemotherapy: A focus on relapsed/refractory germ cell tumors.World journal of clinical oncology · 2021Review
- Frontline Science: CXCR7 mediates CD14Journal of leukocyte biology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autologous hematopoietic SCT (auto-HSCT) can be curative for patients with germ cell tumors. Poor stem cell mobilization jeopardizes the ability to deliver this therapy. Herein, we describe a retrospective study examining safety and efficacy of plerixafor in combination with G-CSF for patients with germ cell tumors who had previously failed stem cell collection. Overall, 21 patients with germ cell tumors and previous mobilization failure were remobilized with G-CSF (10 μg/kg SC) and plerixafor (0.24 mg/kg SC) beginning the evening of day 4 of G-CSF treatment. Dosing of G-CSF and plerixafor was repeated until collection of ≥ 2 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. Remobilization resulted in a median yield of 3.2 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. A total of 17 (81%) patients collected ≥ 2 × 10(6) and 9 (43%) patients collected ≥ 4 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg in a median of 2 (range 1-3) and 3 (range 1-4) days, respectively. In all, 16 (76%) patients proceeded to transplant; 8 (38%) received tandem transplants. There were no serious adverse events. In summary, the majority of patients with germ cell tumors who failed prior mobilization with growth factors ± chemotherapy were remobilized with plerixafor plus G-CSF facilitating at least one auto-HSCT. Use of plerixafor plus G-CSF can increase access of this potentially life-saving procedure to patients with high-risk germ cell tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.