Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22343670›Full record

Trial reportBone marrow transplantation2012

The psychosocial impact of haematopoietic SCT on sibling donors.

B Pillay, S J Lee, L Katona, S De Bono, N Warren, J Fletcher, S Burney

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Bone marrow transplantation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Use of Hematopoietic Stem Cells for Heart Failure: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Experiences and unmet needs of family members requested to donate haematopoietic stem cells to an ill relative: findings from a prospective multi-centre study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Donor assessment and follow-up: not a minor issue.Bone marrow transplantation · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. National Institutes of Health Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Late Effects Initiative: The Patient-Centered Outcomes Working Group Report.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Centers with FACT-JACIE Accreditation Have Significantly Better Compliance with Related Donor Care Standards.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

B PillaySchool of Psychology and Psychiatry, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
S J Lee
L Katona
S De Bono
N Warren
J Fletcher
S Burney
Monash University · AUAlfred Health · AUMonash Alfred Psychiatry Research centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The physical and psychosocial consequences for patients undergoing blood SCT for the treatment of cancer and their families have been extensively documented. There has, however, been far less investigation into the psychosocial consequences for sibling donors who are both family members and undergoing an invasive medical procedure. The aim of this study was therefore to explore the psychosocial impact of PBSC donation before, during and after donation, and to gain insight into donors' experiences of the preparation for, and procedures associated with, donation. Participants included 13 men and 9 women, with a mean age of 53.1 (SD=9.4) years, who underwent PBSC or BM donation between 2007 and 2010. Data were collected via face-to-face or telephone interviews and a questionnaire. Results revealed that a broad range of both positive and negative emotions were experienced at different time points during donation. The psychosocial impact of donation was also influenced by the interactions between factors such as pragmatic aspects of the donation process; family dynamics; perceived adequacy of preparation and emotional support; and uncertainty related to health outcomes for the recipient and donor. Routine provision of psychosocial support to donors as well as recipients is therefore important.

Indexed as

Bone MarrowHematopoietic Stem CellsNeoplasmsPeripheral Blood Stem Cell TransplantationAdultAgedFemaleHumansLiving DonorsMaleMiddle AgedSiblingsSocioeconomic FactorsTransplantation, Homologous

Identifiers

PMID22343670
OpenAlexW1969190142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.