Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22343431›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2012

Using probabilistic estimation of expression residuals (PEER) to obtain increased power and interpretability of gene expression analyses.

Oliver Stegle, Leopold Parts, Matias Piipari, John Winn, Richard Durbin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 654 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
654citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

654 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Integrated Genomic and Transcriptomic Study RevealsCirculation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Atlas of glomerular disease-specific genetic effects on blood transcriptome.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

594 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Oliver StegleMax Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Tübingen, Germany. oliver.stegle@tuebingen.mpg.de
Leopold Parts
Matias Piipari
John Winn
Richard Durbin

Funding

Wellcome Trust 098051Wellcome Trust WT077192/Z/05/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present PEER (probabilistic estimation of expression residuals), a software package implementing statistical models that improve the sensitivity and interpretability of genetic associations in population-scale expression data. This approach builds on factor analysis methods that infer broad variance components in the measurements. PEER takes as input transcript profiles and covariates from a set of individuals, and then outputs hidden factors that explain much of the expression variability. Optionally, these factors can be interpreted as pathway or transcription factor activations by providing prior information about which genes are involved in the pathway or targeted by the factor. The inferred factors are used in genetic association analyses. First, they are treated as additional covariates, and are included in the model to increase detection power for mapping expression traits. Second, they are analyzed as phenotypes themselves to understand the causes of global expression variability. PEER extends previous related surrogate variable models and can be implemented within hours on a desktop computer.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, StatisticalSoftwareFactor Analysis, StatisticalGene Expression ProfilingGenetic Association StudiesSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID22343431
PMCPMC3398141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.