ArticleJournal of structural biology2012
Novel insights through the integration of structural and functional genomics data with protein networks.
Article in Journal of structural biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Innovative approaches to therapeutic target discovery amid the global challenge of antimicrobial resistance.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Review
- Integrating protein copy numbers with interaction networks to quantify stoichiometry in clathrin-mediated endocytosis.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- RNase E in the γ-Proteobacteria: conservation of intrinsically disordered noncatalytic region and molecular evolution of microdomains.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2015Article
- Elucidating the genotype-phenotype relationships and network perturbations of human shared and specific disease genes from an evolutionary perspective.Genome biology and evolution · 2014Article
- Article
- Genotype to phenotype via network analysis.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2013Review
- Evolutionary pressure on the topology of protein interface interaction networks.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2013Article
- The scoring of poses in protein-protein docking: current capabilities and future directions.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
- Structure and dynamics of molecular networks: a novel paradigm of drug discovery: a comprehensive review.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2013Review
- Interface-resolved network of protein-protein interactions.PLoS computational biology · 2013Article
- Protein Nano-Object Integrator (ProNOI) for generating atomic style objects for molecular modeling.BMC structural biology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, major advances in genomics, proteomics, macromolecular structure determination, and the computational resources capable of processing and disseminating the large volumes of data generated by each have played major roles in advancing a more systems-oriented appreciation of biological organization. One product of systems biology has been the delineation of graph models for describing genome-wide protein-protein interaction networks. The network organization and topology which emerges in such models may be used to address fundamental questions in an array of cellular processes, as well as biological features intrinsic to the constituent proteins (or "nodes") themselves. However, graph models alone constitute an abstraction which neglects the underlying biological and physical reality that the network's nodes and edges are highly heterogeneous entities. Here, we explore some of the advantages of introducing a protein structural dimension to such models, as the marriage of conventional network representations with macromolecular structural data helps to place static node and edge constructs in a biologically more meaningful context. We emphasize that 3D protein structures constitute a valuable conceptual and predictive framework by discussing examples of the insights provided, such as enabling in silico predictions of protein-protein interactions, providing rational and compelling classification schemes for network elements, as well as revealing interesting intrinsic differences between distinct node types, such as disorder and evolutionary features, which may then be rationalized in light of their respective functions within networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.