Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22342935›Full record

ArticleJournal of theoretical biology2012

Patient-calibrated agent-based modelling of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): from microscopic measurements to macroscopic predictions of clinical progression.

Paul Macklin, Mary E Edgerton, Alastair M Thompson, Vittorio Cristini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of theoretical biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed
16.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 244 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul MacklinCenter for Applied Molecular Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Paul.Macklin@usc.edu
Mary E Edgerton
Alastair M Thompson
Vittorio Cristini
Society of Surgical Oncology · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of New Mexico · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

TRANS-NETWORK PROJECTSU54CA143907 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI NOLAN, GARRY P · 2009 to 2013
$15.2M
TRANS-NETWORK PROJECTSU54CA143837 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI FERRARI, MAURO · 2009 to 2014
$10.8M
The Core of the Computational BiologyU54CA149196 · NCI · METHODIST HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI WONG, STEPHEN TC · 2010 to 2015
$10.6M
European Research Council 227619NCI NIH HHS 1U54CA143837NCI NIH HHS 1U54CA143907NCI NIH HHS 1U54CA149196NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143837NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143907NCI NIH HHS U54 CA149196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)--a significant precursor to invasive breast cancer--is typically diagnosed as microcalcifications in mammograms. However, the effective use of mammograms and other patient data to plan treatment has been restricted by our limited understanding of DCIS growth and calcification. We develop a mechanistic, agent-based cell model and apply it to DCIS. Cell motion is determined by a balance of biomechanical forces. We use potential functions to model interactions with the basement membrane and amongst cells of unequal size and phenotype. Each cell's phenotype is determined by genomic/proteomic- and microenvironment-dependent stochastic processes. Detailed "sub-models" describe cell volume changes during proliferation and necrosis; we are the first to account for cell calcification. We introduce the first patient-specific calibration method to fully constrain the model based upon clinically-accessible histopathology data. After simulating 45 days of solid-type DCIS with comedonecrosis, the model predicts: necrotic cell lysis acts as a biomechanical stress relief and is responsible for the linear DCIS growth observed in mammography; the rate of DCIS advance varies with the duct radius; the tumour grows 7-10mm per year--consistent with mammographic data; and the mammographic and (post-operative) pathologic sizes are linearly correlated--in quantitative agreement with the clinical literature. Patient histopathology matches the predicted DCIS microstructure: an outer proliferative rim surrounds a stratified necrotic core with nuclear debris on its outer edge and calcification in the centre. This work illustrates that computational modelling can provide new insight on the biophysical underpinnings of cancer. It may 1-day be possible to augment a patient's mammography and other imaging with rigorously-calibrated models that help select optimal surgical margins based upon the patient's histopathologic data.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalBasement MembraneBreast NeoplasmsCalcinosisCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingCell AdhesionCell SizeDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMammographyNecrosisPhenotypeStress, Mechanical

Identifiers

PMID22342935
PMCPMC3322268
OpenAlexW2127225632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.