ArticleJournal of theoretical biology2012
Patient-calibrated agent-based modelling of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): from microscopic measurements to macroscopic predictions of clinical progression.
Article in Journal of theoretical biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
107 citing papers in PubMed, 244 citations in OpenAlex.
- Informing agent-based models with spatial data using convolutional autoencoders.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Multiscale predictive cellular modeling: integrating hypothesis grammars, digital twins, and multi-omics for In silico oncology and precision theranostics.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Review
- Tumor-immune trajectory context connects static tissue architecture to clinical outcomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Overcoming vascular niche-mediated TKI resistance in acute myeloid leukemia through miR-126 inhibition.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- Beyond static biomarkers: systems biology and AI for decoding cancer dynamics.Frontiers in systems biology · 2026Review
- Mathematical Pathological Approach as a Novel Tool for Prognosis in Breast Cancer.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Breast cancer extracellular matrix invasion depends on local mechanical loading of the collagen network.Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2025Article
- Validating the predictions of mathematical models describing tumor growth and treatment response.ArXiv · 2025Article
- Biopsy location and tumor-associated macrophages in predicting malignant glioma recurrence using an in-silico model.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Article
- A hybrid computational model of cancer spheroid growth with ribose-induced collagen stiffening.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Digital twins in healthcare: a comprehensive review and future directions.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
- Agent-based modeling in cancer biomedicine: applications and tools for calibration and validation.Cancer biology & therapy · 2024Review
- A multiscale model of immune surveillance in micrometastases gives insights on cancer patient digital twins.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Article
- Article
- A comprehensive review of computational cell cycle models in guiding cancer treatment strategies.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Review
- In silico study of heterogeneous tumour-derived organoid response to CAR T-cell therapy.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A seven-step guide to spatial, agent-based modelling of tumour evolution.Evolutionary applications · 2024Review
- The bone ecosystem facilitates multiple myeloma relapse and the evolution of heterogeneous drug resistant disease.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Calibration of agent based models for monophasic and biphasic tumour growth using approximate Bayesian computation.Journal of mathematical biology · 2024Article
- Article
47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)--a significant precursor to invasive breast cancer--is typically diagnosed as microcalcifications in mammograms. However, the effective use of mammograms and other patient data to plan treatment has been restricted by our limited understanding of DCIS growth and calcification. We develop a mechanistic, agent-based cell model and apply it to DCIS. Cell motion is determined by a balance of biomechanical forces. We use potential functions to model interactions with the basement membrane and amongst cells of unequal size and phenotype. Each cell's phenotype is determined by genomic/proteomic- and microenvironment-dependent stochastic processes. Detailed "sub-models" describe cell volume changes during proliferation and necrosis; we are the first to account for cell calcification. We introduce the first patient-specific calibration method to fully constrain the model based upon clinically-accessible histopathology data. After simulating 45 days of solid-type DCIS with comedonecrosis, the model predicts: necrotic cell lysis acts as a biomechanical stress relief and is responsible for the linear DCIS growth observed in mammography; the rate of DCIS advance varies with the duct radius; the tumour grows 7-10mm per year--consistent with mammographic data; and the mammographic and (post-operative) pathologic sizes are linearly correlated--in quantitative agreement with the clinical literature. Patient histopathology matches the predicted DCIS microstructure: an outer proliferative rim surrounds a stratified necrotic core with nuclear debris on its outer edge and calcification in the centre. This work illustrates that computational modelling can provide new insight on the biophysical underpinnings of cancer. It may 1-day be possible to augment a patient's mammography and other imaging with rigorously-calibrated models that help select optimal surgical margins based upon the patient's histopathologic data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.