Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22342533›Full record

ReviewTrends in plant science2012

Epigenetic and epigenomic variation in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Robert J Schmitz, Joseph R Ecker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in plant science, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Epigenetic responses of trees to environmental stress in the context of climate change.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Epigenetic Mechanisms of Plant Adaptation to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  15. Genetic and Methylome Variation in TurkishInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Robert J SchmitzPlant Biology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Joseph R Ecker

Funding

Genome-wide transcription factor mapping in Arabidopsis thalianaF32HG004830 · NHGRI · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI SCHMITZ, ROBERT J. · 2003 to 2010
$143k
NHGRI NIH HHS F32 HG004830NHGRI NIH HHS F32-HG004830
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis) is ideally suited for studies of natural phenotypic variation. This species has also provided an unparalleled experimental system to explore the mechanistic link between genetic and epigenetic variation, especially with regard to cytosine methylation. Using high-throughput sequencing methods, genotype to epigenotype to phenotype observations can now be extended to plant populations. We review the evidence for induced and spontaneous epigenetic variants that have been identified in Arabidopsis in the laboratory and discuss how these experimental observations could explain existing variation in the wild.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticGenome, PlantAllelesAnimalsArabidopsisHumansMutation

Identifiers

PMID22342533
PMCPMC3645451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.