ArticleThe Journal of arthroplasty2012
Patient factors predict periprosthetic fractures after revision total hip arthroplasty.
Article in The Journal of arthroplasty, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Risk factors for periprosthetic femoral fractures following hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Factors affecting the incidence of postoperative periprosthetic fractures following primary and revision hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2021Pooled it
- Article
- Multicenter Study of Comorbidities in Patients with Periprosthetic Fractures After Total Hip Arthroplasty and Their Association with Immediate Postoperative Complications.Clinics and practice · 2025Article
- Global mapping of institutional and hospital-based (Level II-IV) arthroplasty registries: a scoping review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024Article
- Periprosthetic joint infection is the main reason for failure in patients following periprosthetic fracture treated with revision arthroplasty.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2022Article
- Management, outcome, and novel classification system of periprosthetic fractures in patients with transcutaneous osseointegrated prosthetic systems (TOPS)-a retrospective cohort analysis.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2022Article
- Treatment Algorithm of Periprosthetic Femoral Fracturens.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2022Review
- Combined Surgical and Medical Treatment for Vancouver B1 and C Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: A Proposal of a Therapeutic Algorithm While Retaining the Original Stable Stem.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2021Article
- Reconstructed the bone stock after femoral bone loss in Vancouver B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures using cortical strut allograft and impacted cancellous allograft.International orthopaedics · 2018Article
- Prevalence and risk factors for intra-operative periprosthetic fractures in one thousand eight hundred and seventy two patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: a cross-sectional study.International orthopaedics · 2015Article
- Incidence and predisposing factors of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures: a literature review.International orthopaedics · 2015Review
- Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures after femoral revision using a long stem.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2015Article
- Underlying diagnosis predicts patient-reported outcomes after revision total knee arthroplasty.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2014Article
- Operative diagnosis for revision total hip arthroplasty is associated with patient-reported outcomes (PROs).BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2013Article
- Periprosthetic Femur Fracture Occuring after Contralateral Neglected Femoral Neck Fracture.Journal of orthopaedic case reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We assessed important patient risk factors for postoperative periprosthetic fractures after revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using prospectively collected Institutional Joint Registry data. We used univariate and multivariable-adjusted Cox regression analyses. There were 330 postoperative periprosthetic fractures after 6281 revision THAs. In multivariable-adjusted analyses, hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of periprosthetic fracture was higher for women (1.66 [1.32-2.080], P < .001), a higher Deyo-Charlson comorbidity index of 2 (1.46 [1.03-2.07]) and index of 3+ (2.01 [1.48-2.73]; overall, P < .001), and operative diagnosis, especially previous nonunion (5.76 [2.55-13.02]; overall, P < .001). Hazard ratio was lower in patients 61 to 70 years old (0.64 [0.49-0.84]) and 71 to 80 years old (0.57 [0.43-0.76]) compared with those younger than 60 years (overall, P < .0001). Our study identified important modifiable and unmodifiable risk factors for fractures after revision THA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.