Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22342122›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry research2012

Cognitive endophenotypes of psychosis within dimension and diagnosis.

Elena I Ivleva, David W Morris, Julian Osuji, Amanda F Moates, Thomas J Carmody, Gunvant K Thaker, Munro Cullum, Carol A Tamminga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cognitive Dysfunction as a Risk Factor for Psychosis.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A polygenic risk score analysis of psychosis endophenotypes across brain functional, structural, and cognitive domains.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Neurobiology of Risk for Bipolar Disorder.Current treatment options in psychiatry · 2016
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elena I IvlevaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA. ivlevaelena@htomail.com
David W Morris
Julian Osuji
Amanda F Moates
Thomas J Carmody
Gunvant K Thaker
Munro Cullum
Carol A Tamminga
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Bipolar & Schizophrenia Consortium for Parsing Intermediate PhenotypesR01MH077851 · NIMH · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TAMMINGA, CAROL A · 2007 to 2019
$7.8M
NIMH NIH HHS MH077851NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH077851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study sought to characterize the psychosis phenotype, contrasting cognitive features within traditional diagnosis and psychosis dimension in a family sample containing both schizophrenia and psychotic bipolar I disorder. Seventy-six probands with psychosis [44 probands with schizophrenia, 32 probands with psychotic bipolar I disorder] and 55 first-degree relatives [30 relatives of schizophrenia probands, 25 relatives of bipolar probands] were recruited. Standardized clinical and neuropsychological measures were administered. No differences in cognitive performance emerged between probands with schizophrenia and probands with psychotic bipolar disorder, or between relatives of probands with schizophrenia and relatives of probands with bipolar disorder in the domains of working and declarative memory, executive function and attention. Relatives overall showed higher cognitive performance compared to probands, as expected. However, when we segmented the probands and relatives along a psychosis dimension, independent of diagnostic groups, results revealed lower cognitive performance in probands compared to relatives without psychosis spectrum disorders, whereas relatives with psychosis spectrum disorders showed an intermediate level of performance across all cognitive domains. In this study, cognitive performance did not distinguish either probands or their first-degree relatives within traditional diagnostic groups (schizophrenia and psychotic bipolar disorder), but distinguished probands and relatives with and without lifetime psychosis manifestations independent of diagnostic categories. These data support the notion that schizophrenia and psychotic bipolar disorder present a clinical continuum with overlapping cognitive features defining the psychosis phenotype.

Indexed as

CognitionEndophenotypesSchizophrenic PsychologyAdultBipolar DisorderFamilyFemaleHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychomotor PerformancePsychotic DisordersSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID22342122
PMCPMC3351583
OpenAlexW2129892266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.