Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22341701›Full record

ArticleLeukemia research2012

Acute myeloid leukemia targeting by myxoma virus in vivo depends on cell binding but not permissiveness to infection in vitro.

Gerard J Madlambayan, Eric Bartee, Manbok Kim, Masmudur M Rahman, Amy Meacham, Edward W Scott, Grant McFadden, Christopher R Cogle

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Oncolytic Virotherapy with Myxoma Virus.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Panorama from the oncolytic virotherapy summit.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2013
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gerard J MadlambayanDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Eric Bartee
Manbok Kim
Masmudur M Rahman
Amy Meacham
Edward W Scott
Grant McFadden
Christopher R Cogle
University of Florida · USKorea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology · KROakland University · US

Funding

UF Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000064 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI NELSON, DAVID R · 2012 to 2014
$12.2M
Myxoma Virus (MV) Oncolysis for treating human cancerR01CA138541 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MCFADDEN, GRANT · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
Virotherapy for pancreatic cancer with wildtype and armed Myxoma virusesR21CA149869 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MCFADDEN, GRANT · 2011 to 2012
$351k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000064NCI NIH HHS R01 CA138541NCI NIH HHS R21 CA149869
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some oncolytic viruses, such as myxoma virus (MYXV), can selectively target malignant hematopoietic cells, while sparing normal hematopoietic cells. This capacity for discrimination creates an opportunity to use oncolytic viruses as ex vivo purging agents of autologous hematopoietic cell grafts in patients with hematologic malignancies. However, the mechanisms by which oncolytic viruses select malignant hematopoietic cells are poorly understood. In this study, we investigated how MYXV specifically targets human AML cells. MYXV prevented chloroma formation and bone marrow engraftment of two human AML cell lines, KG-1 and THP-1. The reduction in human leukemia engraftment after ex vivo MYXV treatment was dose-dependent and required a minimum MOI of 3. Both AML cell lines demonstrated MYXV binding to leukemia cell membranes following co-incubation: however, evidence of productive MYXV infection was observed only in THP-1 cells. This observation, that KG-1 can be targeted in vivo even in the absence of in vitro permissive viral infection, contrasts with the current understanding of oncolytic virotherapy, which assumes that virus infection and productive replication is a requirement. Preventing MYXV binding to AML cells with heparin abrogated the purging capacity of MYXV, indicating that binding of infectious virus particles is a necessary step for effective viral oncolysis. Our results challenge the current dogma of oncolytic virotherapy and show that in vitro permissiveness to an oncolytic virus is not necessarily an accurate predictor of oncolytic potency in vivo.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMiceMyxoma virusOncolytic VirotherapySarcoma, Myeloid

Identifiers

PMID22341701
PMCPMC3312971
OpenAlexW2061868787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.