ReviewClinics in perinatology2012
The use of antifungal therapy in neonatal intensive care.
Review in Clinics in perinatology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- High-Dose Micafungin in Neonates and Young Infants with Invasive Candidiasis: Results of a Phase 2 Study.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021Trial
- Ototoxic and nephrotoxic drugs in neonatal intensive care units: results of a Spanish and Italian survey.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
- Diagnosis and Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Invasive fungal infections in neonates: a review.Pediatric research · 2022Review
- Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antibacterials, antifungals, and antivirals used most frequently in neonates and infants.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2014Review
- Candida parapsilosis and the neonate: epidemiology, virulence and host defense in a unique patient setting.Expert review of anti-infective therapy · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Invasive fungal infections remain a significant cause of infection-related mortality and morbidity in preterm infants. Central nervous system involvement is the hallmark of neonatal candidiasis, differentiating the disease's impact on young infants from that among all other patient populations. Over the past decade, the number of antifungal agents in development has grown, but most are not labeled for use in newborns. We summarize the findings of several antifungal studies that have been completed to date, emphasizing those including infant populations. We conclude that more studies are required for antifungals to be used safely and effectively in infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.