Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22341290›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of urology2012

5-year continence rates, satisfaction and adverse events of burch urethropexy and fascial sling surgery for urinary incontinence.

L Brubaker, H E Richter, P A Norton, M Albo, H M Zyczynski, T C Chai, P Zimmern, S Kraus, L Sirls, J W Kusek and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of urology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04843995 (The Effect of Mid-urethral Sling on the Urethral Dynamic Shape and Motion), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04843995 completednot on this map

The Effect of Mid-urethral Sling on the Urethral Dynamic Shape and Motion

TypeobservationalSponsorEndeavor HealthRan2012 to 2021Enrolled190ConditionsStress Urinary IncontinenceArmsMid-urethral sling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Renaissance of the autologous pubovaginal sling.International urogynecology journal · 2018
    Article
  17. Midurethral slings in the mesh litigation era.Translational andrology and urology · 2017
    Review
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

L BrubakerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 60153, USA. L.Brubaker@lumc.edu
H E Richter
P A Norton
M Albo
H M Zyczynski
T C Chai
P Zimmern
S Kraus
L Sirls
J W Kusek
A Stoddard
S Tennstedt
E Ann Gormley
Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network
New England Research Institutes · USBeaumont Hospital, Royal Oak · USDartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USLoyola University Chicago · USNational Institutes of Health · USThe University of Texas at San Antonio · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network: DCCU01DK058229 · NIDDK · NEW ENGLAND RESEARCH INSTITUTES, INC. · PI TENNSTEDT, SHARON L · 2000 to 2012
$16.1M
UAB Continence Treatment Center U01DK060380 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI RICHTER, HOLLY E · 2001 to 2009
$3.9M
Urinary Incontinence Treatment NetworkU01DK058225 · NIDDK · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI ZYCZYNSKI, HALINA M · 2000 to 2009
$3.8M
Continuation of the Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network (UITN)U01DK060379 · NIDDK · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI BRUBAKER, LINDA · 2001 to 2009
$3.6M
UTAH URINARY INCONTINENCE TREATMENT NETWORK (UUITN)U01DK060393 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI NORTON, PEGGY A · 2001 to 2009
$3.4M
Urinary Incontinence Treatment NetworkU01DK058231 · NIDDK · WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL RESEARCH INST · PI SIRLS, LARRY T · 2000 to 2009
$3.3M
Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network (UITN)U01DK060397 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI CHAI, TOBY C · 2001 to 2010
$2.7M
Urinary Incontinence Treatment NetworkU01DK060395 · NIDDK · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZIMMERN, PHILIPPE E · 2001 to 2009
$2.4M
The Urinary Incontinence Treatment NetworkU01DK058234 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI KRAUS, STEPHEN R · 2000 to 2009
$2.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK058225NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK058229NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK058231NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK058234NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060379NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060380NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060393NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060395NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060397NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK58225NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK58229NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK58231NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK58234NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK60379NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK60380NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK60393NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK60395NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK60397PHS HHS 60401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe characterized continence, satisfaction and adverse events in women at least 5 years after Burch urethropexy or fascial sling with longitudinal followup of randomized clinical trial participants. MATERIALS AND

methodsOf 655 women who participated in a randomized surgical trial comparing the efficacy of the Burch and sling treatments 482 (73.6%) enrolled in this long-term observational study. Urinary continence status was assessed yearly for a minimum of 5 years postoperatively. Continence was defined as no urinary leakage on a 3-day voiding diary, and no self-reported stress incontinence symptoms and no stress incontinence surgical re-treatment.

resultsIncontinent participants were more likely to enroll in the followup study than continent patients (85.5% vs 52.2%) regardless of surgical group (p<0.0001). Overall the continence rates were lower in the Burch urethropexy group than in the fascial sling group (p=0.002). The continence rates at 5 years were 24.1% (95% CI 18.5 to 29.7) vs 30.8% (95% CI 24.7 to 36.9), respectively. Satisfaction at 5 years was related to continence status and was higher in women undergoing sling surgery (83% vs 73%, p=0.04). Satisfaction decreased with time (p=0.001) and remained higher in the sling group (p=0.03). The 2 groups had similar adverse event rates (Burch 10% vs sling 9%) and similar numbers of participants with adverse events (Burch 23 vs sling 22).

conclusionsContinence rates in both groups decreased substantially during 5 years, yet most women reported satisfaction with their continence status. Satisfaction was higher in continent women and in those who underwent fascial sling surgery, despite the voiding dysfunction associated with this procedure.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionFasciaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRemission InductionSuburethral SlingsTime FactorsUrinary Incontinence, StressUrologic Surgical Procedures

Identifiers

PMID22341290
PMCPMC3586411
OpenAlexW1974886478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.