Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22341186›Full record

ReviewClinical radiology2012

Susceptibility weighted imaging of the neonatal brain.

A Meoded, A Poretti, F J Northington, A Tekes, J Intrapiromkul, T A G M Huisman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical radiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Advancements in MRI application in the morphological development of fetal cerebral venous system: a review.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Comparing head ultrasounds and susceptibility-weighted imaging for the detection of low-grade hemorrhages in preterm infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A MeodedDivision of Pediatric Radiology, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
A Poretti
F J Northington
A Tekes
J Intrapiromkul
T A G M Huisman
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Mechanisms of Hypothermic Neuroprotection in NeonatesR01HD070996 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI NORTHINGTON, FRANCES J · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD070996
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) is a well-established magnetic resonance technique, which is highly sensitive for blood, iron, and calcium depositions in the brain and has been implemented in the routine clinical use in both children and neonates. SWI in neonates might provide valuable additional diagnostic and prognostic information for a wide spectrum of neonatal neurological disorders. To date, there are few articles available on the application of SWI in neonatal neurological disorders. The purpose of this article is to illustrate and describe the characteristic SWI findings in various typical neonatal neurological disorders.

Indexed as

Brain DeathBrain DiseasesBrain IschemiaHumansHypoxia-Ischemia, BrainImaging, Three-DimensionalInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesInfant, PrematureInfant, Premature, DiseasesIntracranial HemorrhagesMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingSinus Thrombosis, IntracranialStroke

Identifiers

PMID22341186
PMCPMC4000314
OpenAlexW2093289655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.