Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22340780›Full record

ArticleMedicare & medicaid research review2011

Endocrine therapy use among elderly hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients enrolled in Medicare Part D.

Gerald F Riley, Joan L Warren, Linda C Harlan, Steven A Blackwell

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicare & medicaid research review, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Fractures in a nationwide population-based cohort of users of breast cancer hormonal therapy.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2018
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Socioeconomic status and breast cancer treatment.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gerald F RileyUS Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD 21244, USA. gerald.riley@cms.hhs.gov
Joan L Warren
Linda C Harlan
Steven A Blackwell
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical guidelines recommend that women with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer receive endocrine therapy (selective estrogen receptor modulators [SERMs] or aromatase inhibitors [AIs]) for five years following diagnosis.

objectiveTo examine utilization and adherence to therapy for SERMs and AIs in Medicare Part D prescription drug plans. DATA: Linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data. STUDY

designWe identified 15,542 elderly women diagnosed with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer in years 2003-2005 (the latest SEER data at the time of the study) and enrolled in a Part D plan in 2006 or 2007 (the initial years of Part D). This permitted us to compare utilization and adherence to therapy at various points within the recommended five-year timeframe for endocrine therapy. SERM and AI use was measured from claim records. Non-adherence to therapy was defined as a medication possession ratio of less than 80 percent. PRINCIPAL

findingsBetween May 2006 and December 2007, 22 percent of beneficiaries received SERM, 52 percent AI, and 26 percent received neither. The percent receiving any endocrine therapy decreased with time from diagnosis. Among SERM and AI users, 20-30 percent were non-adherent to therapy; out-of-pocket costs were higher for AI than SERM and were strongly associated with non-adherence. For AI users without a low income subsidy, adherence to therapy deteriorated after reaching the Part D coverage gap.

conclusionsMany elderly breast cancer patients were not receiving therapy for the recommended five years following diagnosis. Choosing a Part D plan that minimizes out-of-pocket costs is critical to ensuring beneficiary access to essential medications.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAromatase InhibitorsBreast NeoplasmsCost SharingDrug CostsDrug MonitoringFemaleFinancing, PersonalHumansMedicare Part DSelective Estrogen Receptor ModulatorsUnited StatesAromatase InhibitorsSelective Estrogen Receptor Modulators

Identifiers

PMID22340780
PMCPMC4010443
OpenAlexW2101944829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.