ArticleBiophysical journal2012
Quantifying the importance of protein conformation on ligand migration in myoglobin.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Migration of small ligands in globins: Xe diffusion in truncated hemoglobin N.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- Ligand and interfacial dynamics in a homodimeric hemoglobin.Structural dynamics (Melville, N.Y.) · 2016Article
- Full kinetics of CO entry, internal diffusion, and exit in myoglobin from transition-path theory simulations.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2015Article
- Internal water and microsecond dynamics in myoglobin.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myoglobin (Mb) is a model system for ligand binding and migration. The energy barriers (ΔG) for ligand migration in Mb have been studied in the past by experiment and theory and significant differences between different approaches were found. From experiment, it is known that Mb can assume a large number of conformational substates. In this work, these substates are investigated as a possible source of the differences in migration barriers. We show that the initial structure significantly affects the calculated ΔG for a particular transition and that fluctuations in barrier heights δΔG are of similar magnitude as the free energy barriers themselves. The sensitivity of ΔG to the initial structure is compared to other sources of errors. Different protein structures can affect the calculated ΔG by up to 4 kcal/mol, whereas differences between simple point charge models and more elaborate multipolar charge models for the CO-ligand are smaller by a factor of two. Analysis of the structural changes underlying the large effect of the conformational substate reveals the importance of coupling between protein and ligand motion for migration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.