Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22339264›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2012

Identification of prostate-enriched proteins by in-depth proteomic analyses of expressed prostatic secretions in urine.

Simona Principe, Yunee Kim, Simona Fontana, Vladimir Ignatchenko, Julius O Nyalwidhe, Raymond S Lance, Dean A Troyer, Riccardo Alessandro, O John Semmes, Thomas Kislinger and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. HBFP: a new repository for human body fluid proteome.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Prostate Cancer Biomarker Development: National Cancer Institute's Early Detection Research Network Prostate Cancer Collaborative Group Review.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Simona PrincipeOntario Cancer Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Yunee Kim
Simona Fontana
Vladimir Ignatchenko
Julius O Nyalwidhe
Raymond S Lance
Dean A Troyer
Riccardo Alessandro
O John Semmes
Thomas Kislinger
Richard R Drake
Jeffrey A Medin
Eastern Virginia Medical School · USUniversity Health Network · CAOntario Institute for Cancer Research · CAUniversity of Palermo · ITUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER BY AFFINITY MASS SPECTROMETRYU01CA085067 · NCI · EASTERN VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI SEMMES, OLIVER JOHN · 1999 to 2009
$5.1M
Glycan Biomarkers of Prostate Cancer in Prostatic FluidsR01CA135087 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI DRAKE, RICHARD R. · 2009 to 2012
$989k
Proximal Prostate Fluids for Protein and miRNA BiomarkersR21CA137704 · NCI · EASTERN VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI DRAKE, RICHARD R. · 2009 to 2010
$347k
CIHR 93772-1CIHR MOP-93772NCI NIH HHS R01 CA135087NCI NIH HHS R21 CA137704NCI NIH HHS U01 CA085067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urinary expressed prostatic secretion or "EPS-urine" is proximal tissue fluid that is collected after a digital rectal exam (DRE). EPS-urine is a rich source of prostate-derived proteins that can be used for biomarker discovery for prostate cancer (PCa) and other prostatic diseases. We previously conducted a comprehensive proteome analysis of direct expressed prostatic secretions (EPS). In the current study, we defined the proteome of EPS-urine employing Multidimensional Protein Identification Technology (MudPIT) and providing a comprehensive catalogue of this body fluid for future biomarker studies. We identified 1022 unique proteins in a heterogeneous cohort of 11 EPS-urines derived from biopsy negative noncancer diagnoses with some benign prostatic diseases (BPH) and low-grade PCa, representative of secreted prostate and immune system-derived proteins in a urine background. We further applied MudPIT-based proteomics to generate and compare the differential proteome from a subset of pooled urines (pre-DRE) and EPS-urines (post-DRE) from noncancer and PCa patients. The direct proteomic comparison of these highly controlled patient sample pools enabled us to define a list of prostate-enriched proteins detectable in EPS-urine and distinguishable from a complex urine protein background. A combinatorial analysis of both proteomics data sets and systematic integration with publicly available proteomics data of related body fluids, human tissue transcriptomic data, and immunohistochemistry images from the Human Protein Atlas database allowed us to demarcate a robust panel of 49 prostate-derived proteins in EPS-urine. Finally, we validated the expression of seven of these proteins using Western blotting, supporting the likelihood that they originate from the prostate. The definition of these prostatic proteins in EPS-urine samples provides a reference for future investigations for prostatic-disease biomarker studies.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesChromatography, High Pressure LiquidDatabases, ProteinGene Expression ProfilingHumansMaleMass SpectrometryProstateProstatic DiseasesProstatic NeoplasmsProstatic Secretory ProteinsProteomeProteomicsReproducibility of ResultsProstatic Secretory ProteinsProteome

Identifiers

PMID22339264
PMCPMC3642074
OpenAlexW2003556442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.