Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22338327›Full record

ReviewCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique

Childhood vision screening in Canada: public health evidence and practice.

Silvina C Mema, Lynn McIntyre, Richard Musto

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Causes of Reduced Vision in Australian Children.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  2. Visual profiling and vision screening of preschool children in Greenland.International journal of circumpolar health · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Weighing in on Canadian school-based vision screening: A call for action.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2017
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Silvina C MemaDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. scmema@ucalgary.ca
Lynn McIntyre
Richard Musto
University of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesBest practice guidelines recommend vision testing in children 3 to 5 years of age for the prevention of amblyopia; however, universal vision screening is controversial. In Canada, amblyopia screening can be the responsibility of physicians, optometrists, and/or Public Health. We review the evidence underlying preschool vision screening for amblyopia using an Evidence-based Public Health (EBPH) approach, and consider implications for the Public Health provision of universal screening programs for amblyopia in Canadian jurisdictions in light of present practices.

methodsWe searched the literature to address each major screening criterion (disease, test, treatment, program requirements) necessary to support preschool vision screening for amblyopia. We also reappraised papers cited in two systematic reviews related to the impact of vision screening. The Chief Medical Officer of Health of each province/territory was sent a short survey asking whether there currently was a Public Health preschool vision screening program in place and if so, for specifics about the program.

resultsAn EBPH approach to the literature with respect to the criteria for screening and available intervention studies support amblyopia screening by Public Health. There is a public health divide in amblyopia screening practice in Canada; while some provinces maintain organized programs, others have chosen to delegate the task to other professionals, without a concurrent surveillance function to monitor disparities in uptake.

conclusionsAmblyopia deserves attention from Public Health. Efforts should be made to maintain existing programs, and provinces without organized screening programs should reconsider their role in the prevention of inequities with regard to preventable blindness in Canadian children.

Indexed as

Vision ScreeningAmblyopiaCanadaChild, PreschoolEvidence-Based MedicineHealth Care SurveysHumans

Identifiers

PMID22338327
PMCPMC6974295
OpenAlexW2138408786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.