Trial reportJAMA2012
Amoxicillin for acute rhinosinusitis: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in JAMA, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00377403 (Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate Guidelines for Acute Rhinosinusitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate Guidelines for Acute Rhinosinusitis (Phase IV Study)
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.
- Procalcitonin as a Biomarker in Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review.American journal of rhinology & allergy · 2019Pooled it
- Antibiotics for acute rhinosinusitis in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Antibiotic efficacy in patients with a moderate probability of acute rhinosinusitis: a systematic review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2016Pooled it
- The prevalence of bacterial infection in acute rhinosinusitis: a Systematic review and meta-analysis.The Laryngoscope · 2015Pooled it
- High-Dose vs Standard-Dose Amoxicillin Plus Clavulanate for Adults With Acute Sinusitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2021Trial
- High-dose versus standard-dose amoxicillin/clavulanate for clinically-diagnosed acute bacterial sinusitis: A randomized clinical trial.PloS one · 2018Trial
- Prognosis and prediction of antibiotic benefit in adults with clinically diagnosed acute rhinosinusitis: an individual participant data meta-analysis.Diagnostic and prognostic research · 2023Article
- Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Evaluation of Amoxicillin after Solubility Enhancement Using the Spray Drying Technique.ACS omega · 2022Article
- Patients' acceptance of placebo antibiotics in Japan: a prescription for antimicrobial resistance.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2022Article
- Is there a role for antibiotics in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis?The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2022Review
- Antibiotic Prescriptions for Respiratory Tract Viral Infections in the Colombian Population.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Article
- Antibiotic use for acute respiratory tract infections (ARTI) in primary care; what factors affect prescribing and why is it important? A narrative review.Irish journal of medical science · 2018Review
- Antibiotic prescribing behavior among general practitioners - a questionnaire-based study in Germany.BMC infectious diseases · 2018Article
- Overuse of diagnostic tools and medications in acute rhinosinusitis in Spain: a population-based study (the PROSINUS study).BMJ open · 2018Observational
- Antibiotic Treatment for First Episode of Acute Otitis Media Is Not Associated with Future Recurrences.PloS one · 2016Article
- Diagnosis and treatment of acute sinusitis in the primary care setting: A retrospective cohort.The Laryngoscope · 2015Article
- Article
- Antibiotic prescribing for respiratory infections at retail clinics, physician practices, and emergency departments.The American journal of managed care · 2015Article
- A comparison of the efficacy of amoxicillin and nasal irrigation in treatment of acute sinusitis in children.Korean journal of pediatrics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by[Not Available].2012
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
contextEvidence to support antibiotic treatment for acute rhinosinusitis is limited, yet antibiotics are commonly used.
objectiveTo determine the incremental effect of amoxicillin treatment over symptomatic treatments for adults with clinically diagnosed acute rhinosinusitis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsA randomized, placebo-controlled trial of adults with uncomplicated, acute rhinosinusitis were recruited from 10 community practices in Missouri between November 1, 2006, and May 1, 2009.
interventionsTen-day course of either amoxicillin (1500 mg/d) or placebo administered in 3 doses per day. All patients received a 5- to 7-day supply of symptomatic treatments for pain, fever, cough, and nasal congestion to use as needed.
main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was improvement in disease-specific quality of life after 3 to 4 days of treatment assessed with the Sinonasal Outcome Test-16 (minimally important difference of 0.5 units on a 0-3 scale). Secondary outcomes included the patient's retrospective assessment of change in sinus symptoms and functional status, recurrence or relapse, and satisfaction with and adverse effects of treatment. Outcomes were assessed by telephone interview at days 3, 7, 10, and 28.
resultsA total of 166 adults (36% male; 78% with white race) were randomized to amoxicillin (n = 85) or placebo (n = 81); 92% concurrently used 1 or more symptomatic treatments (94% for amoxicillin group vs 90% for control group; P = .34). The mean change in Sinonasal Outcome Test-16 scores was not significantly different between groups on day 3 (decrease of 0.59 in the amoxicillin group and 0.54 in the control group; mean difference between groups of 0.03 [95% CI, -0.12 to 0.19]) and on day 10 (mean difference between groups of 0.01 [95% CI, -0.13 to 0.15]), but differed at day 7 favoring amoxicillin (mean difference between groups of 0.19 [95% CI, 0.024 to 0.35]). There was no statistically significant difference in reported symptom improvement at day 3 (37% for amoxicillin group vs 34% for control group; P = .67) or at day 10 (78% vs 80%, respectively; P = .71), whereas at day 7 more participants treated with amoxicillin reported symptom improvement (74% vs 56%, respectively; P = .02). No between-group differences were found for any other secondary outcomes. No serious adverse events occurred.
conclusionAmong patients with acute rhinosinusitis, a 10-day course of amoxicillin compared with placebo did not reduce symptoms at day 3 of treatment.
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00377403.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.