Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22337532›Full record

Trial reportCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2012

Validity of eight integrated healthcare delivery organizations' administrative clinical data to capture breast cancer chemotherapy exposure.

Thomas Delate, Erin J Aiello Bowles, Roy Pardee, Robert D Wellman, Laurel A Habel, Marianne Ulcickas Yood, Larissa Nekhlyudov, Katrina A Goddard, Robert L Davis, Catherine A McCarty and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Comparative effectiveness of adjunctive bevacizumab for advanced lung cancer: the cancer research network experience.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Thomas DelatePharmacy Department, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, 16601 E. Centretech Pkwy., Aurora, CO 80011, USA. tom.delate@kp.org
Erin J Aiello Bowles
Roy Pardee
Robert D Wellman
Laurel A Habel
Marianne Ulcickas Yood
Larissa Nekhlyudov
Katrina A Goddard
Robert L Davis
Catherine A McCarty
Adedayo A Onitilo
Heather Spencer Feigelson
Jared Freml
Edward Wagner

Funding

The HMO Cancer Research Network (CRN)U19CA079689 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI WAGNER, EDWARD H · 1999 to 2011
$62.6M
NCI NIH HHS 5U19 CA07689-10NCI NIH HHS U19 CA079689
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer Research Network (CRN) sites use administrative data to populate their Virtual Data Warehouse (VDW). However, information on VDW chemotherapy data validity is limited. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity of VDW chemotherapy data.

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of women ≥18 years with incident, invasive breast cancer diagnosed between January 1999 and December 2007. Pharmacy and procedure chemotherapy data were extracted from each site's VDW. Random samples of 50 patients stratified on trastuzumab, anthracyclines, and no chemotherapy exposure was selected from each site for detailed chart abstraction. Weighted sensitivities and specificities of VDW compared with abstracted data were calculated. Cumulative doses calculated from VDW data were compared with doses obtained from the medical chart review.

resultsThe cohort included 13,497 patients with 6,456 (48%) chart review eligible. Patients in the sample (N = 400) had a mean age of 65 years. Trastuzumab, anthracycline, and other chemotherapy weighted sensitivities were 95%, 97%, and 100%, respectively; specificities were 99%, 99%, and 93%, respectively; positive predictive values were 96%, 99%, and 55%, respectively; and negative predictive values were 99%, 96%, and 100%. Trastuzumab and anthracyclines VDW mean doses were 873 and 386 mg, respectively, whereas abstracted mean doses were 1,734 and 369 mgs, respectively (R(2) = 0.14, P < 0.01 and R(2) = 0.05, P = 0.03, respectively).

conclusionsSensitivities and specificities for CRN chemotherapy VDW data were high and dosages were correlated with chart information. IMPACT: The findings support the use of CRN data in evaluating chemotherapy exposures and related outcomes.

Indexed as

Data CollectionHealth Services ResearchAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantDatabases, FactualDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID22337532
PMCPMC3319397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.