Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22337437›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of craniofacial surgery2012

Gene therapy: implications for craniofacial regeneration.

Erica L Scheller, Luis G Villa-Diaz, Paul H Krebsbach

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Temporomandibular Joint Regenerative Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  3. Biomaterials for Craniofacial Bone Regeneration.Dental clinics of North America · 2017
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erica L SchellerDepartment of Biologic and Materials Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1078, USA.
Luis G Villa-Diaz
Paul H Krebsbach
ProQuest (United States) · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

BONE MARROW STROMAL CELLS FOR SKELETAL REGENERATIONR01DE013835 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KREBSBACH, PAUL H · 2001 to 2005
$1.3M
A Role of Osteoimmunology in Leptin-Regulated Bone MetabolismF30DE019577 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SCHELLER, ERICA LYNN · 2008 to 2010
$121k
NIDCR NIH HHS F30 DE019577NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE013835NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE13835
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene therapy in the craniofacial region provides a unique tool for delivery of DNA to coordinate protein production in both time and space. The drive to bring this technology to the clinic is derived from the fact that more than 85% of the global population may at one time require repair or replacement of a craniofacial structure. This need ranges from mild tooth decay and tooth loss to temporomandibular joint disorders and large-scale reconstructive surgery. Our ability to insert foreign DNA into a host cell has been developing since the early uses of gene therapy to alter bacterial properties for waste cleanup in the 1980s followed by successful human clinical trials in the 1990s to treat severe combined immunodeficiency. In the past 20 years, the emerging field of craniofacial tissue engineering has adopted these techniques to enhance regeneration of mineralized tissues, salivary gland, and periodontium and to reduce tumor burden of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Studies are currently pursuing research on both biomaterial-mediated gene delivery and more clinically efficacious, although potentially more hazardous, viral methods. Although hundreds of gene therapy clinical trials have taken place in the past 20 years, we must still work to ensure an ideal safety profile for each gene and delivery method combination. With adequate genotoxicity testing, we can expect gene therapy to augment protein delivery strategies and potentially allow for tissue-specific targeting, delivery of multiple signals, and increased spatial and temporal control with the goal of natural tissue replacement in the craniofacial complex.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsBone RegenerationFacial BonesGenetic EngineeringGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsGene Transfer TechniquesHumansProtein EngineeringSkullTissue EngineeringBiocompatible Materials

Identifiers

PMID22337437
PMCPMC3282143
OpenAlexW2092800421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.