Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22337166›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2012

ppGpp: magic beyond RNA polymerase.

Zachary D Dalebroux, Michele S Swanson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 256 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
256citing papers in PubMed
19.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

256 citing papers in PubMed, 445 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Virulence · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Molecular turn inEmerging microbes & infections · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Transcriptomic and proteomic ramifications of segmental amplification inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

196 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zachary D DalebrouxDepartment of Microbiology, University of Washington, Health Sciences Building K116, 1959 NE Pacific St., Box 357710, Seattle, Washington 98195-7710, USA.
Michele S Swanson
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Analysis of L. Pneumophilia Virulence RegulationR01AI044212 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SWANSON, MICHELE SOMES · 1999 to 2010
$2.1M
NIAID NIH HHS 2 R01 AI44212NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI044212
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During stress, bacteria undergo extensive physiological transformations, many of which are coordinated by ppGpp. Although ppGpp is best known for enhancing cellular resilience by redirecting the RNA polymerase (RNAP) to certain genes, it also acts as a signal in many other cellular processes in bacteria. After a brief overview of ppGpp biosynthesis and its impact on promoter selection by RNAP, we discuss how bacteria exploit ppGpp to modulate the synthesis, stability or activity of proteins or regulatory RNAs that are crucial in challenging environments, using mechanisms beyond the direct regulation of RNAP activity.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesEnvironmentGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGuanosine TetraphosphateSigma FactorDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesGuanosine TetraphosphateSigma Factor

Identifiers

PMID22337166
PMCPMC13198741
OpenAlexW1986842298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.