Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22336854›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012

Vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy.

Luz Maria De-Regil, Cristina Palacios, Ali Ansary, Regina Kulier, Juan Pablo Peña-Rosas

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02434380 (Effect of Vitamin D Replacement on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 113 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02434380 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Vitamin D Replacement on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes: a Randomized Controlled Trial in Pregnant Women With Hypovitaminosis D

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmerican University of Beirut Medical CenterRan2015 to 2018Enrolled330ConditionsHypovitaminosis D, Pregnancy Complications, Infant, Newborn, DiseasesArmsEuro D
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 189 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Guideline
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Single high-dose vitamin D at birth corrects vitamin D deficiency in infants in Mexico.International journal of food sciences and nutrition · 2015
    Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Luz Maria De-RegilEvidence and Programme Guidance, Department of Nutrition for Health and Development, World Health Organization, Geneva,Switzerland. deregillu@who.int.
Cristina Palacios
Ali Ansary
Regina Kulier
Juan Pablo Peña-Rosas
World Health Organization - Pakistan · PKChildren's Hospital of Orange County · USUniversity of Puerto Rico System · PR

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL PROTEOMICS CENTERG12MD007600 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO MED SCIENCES · PI FERNANDEZ-REPOLLET, EMMA · 2012 to 2016
$11.0M
NIMHD NIH HHS G12 MD007600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVitamin D deficiency or insufficiency is thought to be common among pregnant women. Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy has been suggested as an intervention to protect against adverse gestational outcomes.

objectivesTo examine whether supplements with vitamin D alone or in combination with calcium or other vitamins and minerals given to women during pregnancy can safely improve maternal and neonatal outcomes. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 October 2011), the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (31 October 2011), the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (28 October 2011) and also contacted relevant organisations (8 April 2011). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials with randomisation at either individual or cluster level, evaluating the effect of supplementation with vitamin D alone or in combination with other micronutrients for women during pregnancy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently i) assessed the eligibility of studies against the inclusion criteria ii) extracted data from included studies, and iii) assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Data were checked for accuracy. MAIN

resultsThe search strategy identified 34 potentially eligible references. We included six trials assessing a total of 1023 women, excluded eight studies, and 10 studies are still ongoing. Five trials involving 623 women compared the effects of vitamin D alone versus no supplementation/placebo and one trial with 400 women compared the effects of vitamin D and calcium versus no supplementation.Only one trial with 400 women reported on pre-eclampsia: women who received 1200 IU vitamin D along with 375 mg of elemental calcium per day were as likely to develop pre-eclampsia as women who received no supplementation (average risk ratio (RR) 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33 to 1.35). Data from four trials involving 414 women consistently show that women who received vitamin D supplements had higher concentrations of vitamin D in serum at term than those women who received no intervention or a placebo; however the magnitude of the response was highly heterogenous. Data from three trials involving 463 women suggest that women who receive vitamin D supplements during pregnancy less frequently had a baby with a birthweight below 2500 grams than those women receiving no treatment or placebo; statistical significance was borderline (RR 0.48; 95% CI 0.23 to 1.01).In terms of other conditions, there were no significant differences in adverse side effects including nephritic syndrome (RR 0.17; 95% CI 0.01 to 4.06; one trial, 135 women); stillbirths (RR 0.17; 95% CI 0.01 to 4.06; one trial, 135 women) or neonatal deaths (RR 0.17; 95% CI 0.01 to 4.06; one trial, 135 women) between women who received vitamin D supplements in comparison with women who received no treatment or placebo. No studies reported on preterm birth, maternal death, admission to neonatal intensive care unit/special nursery or Apgar scores. AUTHORS'

conclusionsVitamin D supplementation in a single or continued dose during pregnancy increases serum vitamin D concentrations as measured by 25-hydroxyvitamin D at term. The clinical significance of this finding and the potential use of this intervention as a part of routine antenatal care are yet to be determined as the number of high quality trials and outcomes reported is too limited to draw conclusions on its usefulness and safety. Further rigorous randomised trials are required to evaluate the role of vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy.

Indexed as

Calcium, DietaryFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVitamin DVitamin D DeficiencyVitamins25-hydroxyvitamin DCalcium, DietaryVitamin DVitamins

Identifiers

PMID22336854
PMCPMC3747784
OpenAlexW4211043344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.