SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012
Cancer genetic risk assessment for individuals at risk of familial breast cancer.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic evidence review and meta-analysis of outcomes associated with cancer genetic counseling.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2024Pooled it
- Psychological Distress, Anxiety, and Depression of Cancer-Affected BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers: a Systematic Review.Journal of genetic counseling · 2016Pooled it
- Increasing confidence and changing behaviors in primary care providers engaged in genetic counselling.BMC medical education · 2017Trial
- Does rapid genetic counseling and testing in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients cause additional psychosocial distress? results from a randomized clinical trial.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2016Trial
- Concerns about unintended negative consequences of informing the public about multifactorial risks may be premature for young adult smokers.British journal of health psychology · 2014Trial
- Call to action for genetic counseling research in hereditary cancer: Considerations from the evidence-based guidelines development process.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- The Risk of Antipsychotic Drugs on Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Oman medical journal · 2022Review
- Associations between Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Exposure and Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.Toxics · 2022Review
- Article
- A regional population-based hereditary breast cancer screening tool in Italy: First 5-year results.Cancer medicine · 2020Article
- Effectiveness of interventions to identify and manage patients with familial cancer risk in primary care: a systematic review.Journal of community genetics · 2020Article
- Article
- Psychological outcomes and surgical decisions after genetic testing in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer with and without a family history.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2018Article
- Genetic assessment wait time indicators in the High Risk Ontario Breast Screening Program.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2018Article
- Communication of cancer-related genetic and genomic information: A landscape analysis of reviews.Translational behavioral medicine · 2018Review
- Views of Low-Income Women of Color at Increased Risk for Breast Cancer.Narrative inquiry in bioethics · 2018Article
- Germline genetic variants with implications for disease risk and therapeutic outcomes.Physiological genomics · 2017Review
- Making genomic medicine evidence-based and patient-centered: a structured review and landscape analysis of comparative effectiveness research.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2017Review
- Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) testing in ovarian cancer clinical practice: a review of the literature.Gynecologic oncology research and practice · 2017Review
- When knowledge of a heritable gene mutation comes out of the blue: treatment-focused genetic testing in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe recognition of an inherited component to breast cancer has led to an increase in demand for information, reassurance, and genetic testing, which has resulted in the creation of genetic clinics for familial cancer. The first step for patients referred to a cancer genetic clinic is a risk assessment.
objectivesTo evaluate the impact of cancer genetic risk-assessment services on patients at risk of familial breast cancer. SEARCH
methodsThe specialised register maintained by the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group was searched on 16th February 2005. We also searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycLIT, CENTRAL, DARE, ASSIA, Web of Science, SIGLE and LILACS. The original searches covered the period 1985 to February 2005. We also handsearched relevant journals. For this review update the search was repeated through to April 2011. SELECTION CRITERIA: We considered trials looking at interventions for cancer genetic risk-assessment services for familial breast cancer for inclusion. Trials assessed outcomes such as understanding of risk, satisfaction and psychological well-being. We excluded studies if they concerned cancers other than breast cancer or if participants were not at risk of inherited breast cancer. We also excluded trials concerning the provision of general cancer genetic information or education as this review was concerned with the delivery of genetic risk assessment. Participants could be individuals of any age or gender, with or without a known BRCA mutation, but without a previous history of breast cancer or any other serious illness. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Additional information was sought from investigators as necessary. Due to the heterogeneity of both the interventions and outcomes, we reported data descriptively. MAIN
resultsIn this review update, we included five new trials, bringing the total number of included studies to eight. The included trials (pertaining to 10 papers), provided data on 1973 participants and assessed the impact of cancer genetic risk assessment on outcomes including perceived risk of inherited cancer, and psychological distress. This review suggests that cancer genetic risk-assessment services help to reduce distress, improve the accuracy of the perceived risk of breast cancer, and increase knowledge about breast cancer and genetics. The health professional delivering the risk assessment does not appear to have a significant impact on these outcomes. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThis review found favourable outcomes for patients after risk assessment for familial breast cancer. However, there were too few papers to make any significant conclusions about how best to deliver cancer genetic risk-assessment services. Further research is needed assessing the best means of delivering cancer risk assessment, by different health professionals, in different ways and in alternative locations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.