Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22336530›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2012

Early use of imipenem/cilastatin and vancomycin followed by de-escalation versus conventional antimicrobials without de-escalation for patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia in a medical ICU: a randomized clinical trial.

Jong Wook Kim, Joowon Chung, Sang-Ho Choi, Hang Jea Jang, Sang-Bum Hong, Chae-Man Lim, Younsuck Koh

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Epidemiology and Outcomes of Antibiotic De-escalation in Patients With Suspected Sepsis in US Hospitals.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Physician Responsiveness to Positive Blood Culture Results at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Hospital-Is Anyone Paying Attention?Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The significance of persistent fever in the treatment of suspected bacterial infections among inpatients: a prospective cohort study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2015
    Article
  20. Antibiotic stewardship in the intensive care unit.Critical care (London, England) · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jong Wook KimDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 86 Asanbyeongwon-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Korea.
Joowon Chung
Sang-Ho Choi
Hang Jea Jang
Sang-Bum Hong
Chae-Man Lim
Younsuck Koh
Asan Medical Center · KRUlsan College · KRUniversity of Ulsan · KRInje University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough early use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials in critically ill patients may increase antimicrobial adequacy, uncontrolled use of these agents may select for more-resistant organisms. This study investigated the effects of early use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials in critically ill patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia.

methodsWe compared the early use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials plus subsequent de-escalation (DE) with conventional antimicrobial treatment (non-de-escalation, NDE) in critically ill patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP). This open-label, randomized clinical trial was performed in patients in a tertiary-care center medical intensive care unit (MICU) in Korea. Patients (n=54) randomized to the DE group received initial imipenem/cilastatin plus vancomycin with subsequent de-escalation according to culture results, whereas patients randomized to the NDE group (n=55) received noncarbapenem, nonvancomycin empiric antimicrobials.

resultsBetween November 2004 and October 2006, 109 MICU patients with HAP were enrolled. Initial antimicrobial adequacy was significantly higher in the DE than in the NDE group for Gram-positive organisms (100% versus 14.3%; P<0.001), but not for Gram-negative organisms (64.3% versus 85.7%; P=0.190). Mean intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and 14-day, 28-day, and overall mortality rates did not differ in the two groups. Among culture-positive patients, mortality from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pneumonia was higher in the DE group, even after early administration of vancomycin. Multidrug-resistant organisms, especially MRSA, were more likely to emerge in the DE group (adjusted hazard ratio for emergence of MRSA, 3.84; 95% confidence interval, 1.06 to 13.91).

conclusionsThe therapeutic advantage of early administration of broad-spectrum antimicrobials, especially with vancomycin, was not evident in this study.

Indexed as

AgedAnti-Infective AgentsCilastatinCilastatin, Imipenem Drug CombinationCross InfectionDrug CombinationsFemaleHospital MortalityHumansImipenemIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPneumonia, BacterialTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAnti-Infective AgentsCilastatinCilastatin, Imipenem Drug CombinationDrug CombinationsImipenemVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID22336530
PMCPMC3396273
OpenAlexW2096914175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.