Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22336100›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2012

Unsupervised machine-learning method for improving the performance of ambulatory fall-detection systems.

Mitchell Yuwono, Bruce D Moulton, Steven W Su, Branko G Celler, Hung T Nguyen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Fall detection with body-worn sensors : a systematic review.Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2013
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Learning from Few Subjects with Large Amounts of Voice Monitoring Data.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A wavelet-based approach to fall detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015
    Article
  14. A ZigBee-based location-aware fall detection system for improving elderly telecare.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2014
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Falls are unintentional: Studying simulations is a waste of faking time.Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mitchell YuwonoFaculty of Engineering and IT, University of Technology Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia.
Bruce D Moulton
Steven W Su
Branko G Celler
Hung T Nguyen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFalls can cause trauma, disability and death among older people. Ambulatory accelerometer devices are currently capable of detecting falls in a controlled environment. However, research suggests that most current approaches can tend to have insufficient sensitivity and specificity in non-laboratory environments, in part because impacts can be experienced as part of ordinary daily living activities.

methodWe used a waist-worn wireless tri-axial accelerometer combined with digital signal processing, clustering and neural network classifiers. The method includes the application of Discrete Wavelet Transform, Regrouping Particle Swarm Optimization, Gaussian Distribution of Clustered Knowledge and an ensemble of classifiers including a multilayer perceptron and Augmented Radial Basis Function (ARBF) neural networks.

resultsPreliminary testing with 8 healthy individuals in a home environment yields 98.6% sensitivity to falls and 99.6% specificity for routine Activities of Daily Living (ADL) data. Single ARB and MLP classifiers were compared with a combined classifier. The combined classifier offers the greatest sensitivity, with a slight reduction in specificity for routine ADL and an increased specificity for exercise activities. In preliminary tests, the approach achieves 100% sensitivity on in-group falls, 97.65% on out-group falls, 99.33% specificity on routine ADL, and 96.59% specificity on exercise ADL.

conclusionThe pre-processing and feature-extraction steps appear to simplify the signal while successfully extracting the essential features that are required to characterize a fall. The results suggest this combination of classifiers can perform better than MLP alone. Preliminary testing suggests these methods may be useful for researchers who are attempting to improve the performance of ambulatory fall-detection systems.

Indexed as

AccelerationAccidental FallsAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceActivities of Daily LivingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMonitoring, AmbulatoryMovementNeural Networks, ComputerSensitivity and SpecificitySignal Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID22336100
PMCPMC3395835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.