ArticleBMC family practice2012
Describing the content of primary care: limitations of Canadian billing data.
Article in BMC family practice, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Primary care for depression before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective pre-post study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Characteristics of family physicians with additional training or focused practices in caring for older adults: Population-based retrospective cohort study.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2024Article
- The Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) cohort study: updated protocol.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- Ontario family physicians' perspectives about their scope of practice: what is it, what drives it and how does it change?BMC primary care · 2022Article
- Leaving the Walkman and ICD-9 Behind: Modernizing the Disease Classification System Used by Canadian Physicians.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2022Article
- Increasing likelihood of prescribing recommended lipid management: Primary care providers' participation in cardiology continuing medical education.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022Article
- Current State of Quantitative Data Available for Examining the Work of Family Physicians in Canada.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2021Article
- The use of mobile application in primary health care in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2020Article
- Identification of physicians providing comprehensive primary care in Ontario: a retrospective analysis using linked administrative data.CMAJ open · 2017Article
- Patient's Utilization of Primary Care: A Profile of Clinical and Administrative Reasons for Visits in Israel.Journal of primary care & community health · 2017Observational
- Article
- Data quality of electronic medical records in Manitoba: do problem lists accurately reflect chronic disease billing diagnoses?Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016Article
- From patient care to research: a validation study examining the factors contributing to data quality in a primary care electronic medical record database.BMC family practice · 2015Article
- Characteristics of ambulatory care visits to family medicine specialists in Taiwan: a nationwide analysis.PeerJ · 2015Article
- Mining rich health data from Canadian physician claims: features and face validity.BMC research notes · 2014Article
- Smoking cessation advice recorded during pregnancy in United Kingdom primary care.BMC family practice · 2014Article
- Management of cough in patients with idiopathic interstitial lung diseases in primary care.Chronic respiratory diseaseArticle
- Updating Canada's diagnostic coding system for physician billing: Exploring family physician perspectives of ICD-11 and ICPC-3.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadienArticle
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary health care systems are designed to provide comprehensive patient care. However, the ICD 9 coding system used for billing purposes in Canada neither characterizes nor captures the scope of clinical practice or complexity of physician-patient interactions. This study aims to describe the content of primary care clinical encounters and examine the limitations of using administrative data to capture the content of these visits. Although a number of U.S studies have described the content of primary care encounters, this is the first Canadian study to do so.
methodsStudy-specific data collection forms were completed by 16 primary care physicians in community health and family practice clinics in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. The data collection forms were completed immediately following the patient encounter and included patient and visit characteristics, such as primary reason for visit, topics discussed, actions taken, degree of complexity as well as diagnosis and ICD-9 codes.
resultsData was collected for 760 patient encounters. The diagnostic codes often did not reflect the dominant topic of the visit or the topic requiring the most amount of time. Physicians often address multiple problems and provide numerous services thus increasing the complexity of care.
conclusionThis is one of the first Canadian studies to critically analyze the content of primary care clinical encounters. The data allowed a greater understanding of primary care clinical encounters and attests to the deficiencies of singular ICD-9 coding which fails to capture the comprehensiveness and complexity of the primary care encounter. As primary care reform initiatives in the U.S and Canada attempt to transform the way family physicians deliver care, it becomes increasingly important that other tools for structuring primary care data are considered in order to help physicians, researchers and policy makers understand the breadth and complexity of primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.