ArticleFuture oncology (London, England)2012
An iron regulatory gene signature in breast cancer: more than a prognostic genetic profile?
Article in Future oncology (London, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pre-Clinical Insights into the Iron and Breast Cancer Hypothesis.Biomedicines · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Miller LD, Coffman LG, Chou JW et al. An iron regulatory gene signature predicts outcome in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 71(21), 6728-6737 (2011). In breast cancer, recent progress in technology has enabled us to define different prognostic genetic signatures. Based upon them, breast tumors have been grouped into the four principal categories: basal-like or triple-negative, erbB2-positive, normal-like, and luminal type (A and B); with luminal types sharing the expression of estrogen receptor- and/or progesterone receptor-related genes and, basal-like and erbB2-positive subgroups associated with worse prognosis. So far, Oncotype DX(®) (Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA), Mammaprint(®) (Agendia Inc, Huntington Beach, CA, USA), the Breast Cancer Index(®) (BCI, Biotheranostics, San Diego, CA, USA) and PAM50 (Expression Analysis Inc., Durham, NC, USA) are the only multigene assays that have been marketed in North America and Europe. However, any genetic signature assay still has to gain acceptance as a validated assay before introduction into current clinical practice. This study describes an iron regulatory gene signature (IRGS) in breast cancer associated with clinical outcome. Within the molecular luminal type, the IRGS provides prognostic information similar to Oncotype DX and gene sets selected to assess proliferation. In spite of this, it is relevant that two complementary pathways that are regulatory of iron metabolism - the iron export (Fp/HAMP) and the iron import (TFRC/HFE) gene dyads - were embedded in the IRGS gene set and were associated with clinical outcome as well. Differences in metabolic pathways between cancer and normal cells have been widely described, and potential applications for more refined therapy have been proposed by expanding genetic signature assessment technology to concomitant metabolic pathways investigation. Consistent with this, it is reasonable to imagine that the iron-export and the iron-import gene dyads will be considered potential targets for treatment of breast cancer patients expressing the IRGS genes.
Identifiers
22335577What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.