Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22334808›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine2012

A pilot study assessing adherence to auto-bilevel following a poor initial encounter with CPAP.

Eric D Powell, Peter C Gay, Joseph M Ojile, Mikhail Litinski, Atul Malhotra

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00635206 phase3completednot on this map

Investigation of a Novel Positive Pressure Therapy to Rescue Patients Failing to Tolerate CPAP During an Initial Encounter

TypeinterventionalSponsorClayton Sleep InsitituteRan2007 to 2009Enrolled51ConditionsObstructive Sleep ApneaArmsBiPap auto with Fi Flex, Standard CPAP
NCT02522442 nacompletednot on this map

Phase IV Study of Bi-Level Positive Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP)Compared to Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorPhilips RespironicsRan2007 to 2009Enrolled51ConditionsObstructive Sleep ApneaArmsCPAP, Auto BiLevel
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Treatment of Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea With Positive Airway Pressure: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and GRADE Assessment.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Surgical treatment for obstructive sleep apnea: effect on sleep architecture.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pressure-Relief Features of Fixed and Autotitrating Continuous Positive Airway Pressure May Impair Their Efficacy: Evaluation with a Respiratory Bench Model.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2016
    Article
  12. Efficacy of Bilevel-auto Treatment in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Not Responsive to or Intolerant of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2015
    Article
  13. Review
  14. On the cutting edge of obstructive sleep apnoea: where next?The Lancet. Respiratory medicine · 2015
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Adult obstructive sleep apnoea.Lancet (London, England) · 2014
    Review
  17. The Quest to Improve CPAP Adherence--PAP Potpourri is Still Not the Answer, but more research is needed.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2012
    Article
  18. Driving on "auto": hands-on is more effective than hands-free.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2012
    Article
  19. The quest to improve CPAP adherence--PAP potpourri is not the answer.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2012
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eric D PowellSleep Therapy & Research Center, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA. powell.eric@sleeptrc.com
Peter C Gay
Joseph M Ojile
Mikhail Litinski
Atul Malhotra

Funding

Wakefulness and Forebrain Activation by Orexin NeuronsP01HL095491 · NHLBI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI MOCHIZUKI, TAKATOSHI · 2010 to 2019
$25.1M
Single Motor Unit Genioglossus Recordings to Understand Sleep Apnea PathogenesisR01HL085188 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MALHOTRA, ATUL · 2008 to 2018
$3.5M
Mechanisms Underlying the Aging Predisposition to Obstructive Sleep ApneaR01HL090897 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI MALHOTRA, ATUL · 2009 to 2012
$1.8M
Assessment of Upper Airway Mechanics Using Newer EMG TechniquesK24HL093218 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MALHOTRA, ATUL · 2009 to 2013
$857k
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL093218NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL095491NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL085188NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL090897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesWe hypothesized that early intervention with an auto bilevel device would improve treatment adherence compared to CPAP among OSA patients with a poor initial experience with lab-based CPAP titration.

methodsPatients with a poor initial CPAP experience were recruited for this parallel group, randomized, double-blind, controlled pilot study. After an in-lab titration, patients were randomized with either an auto-bilevel device or CPAP. Treatment adherence and functioning were assessed at 90 days.

resultsWe enrolled 51 subjects, with 47 completing the protocol. Groups were equally matched for gender, age, education, and OSA severity. There was no significant difference in the proportion of compliant subjects (≥ 4 h/night) between the auto bilevel and CPAP groups (62% vs. 54%; p = 0.624) after 90 days of use. Functional outcomes significantly improved in both groups during treatment use (p < 0.001) but did not differ between groups.

conclusionsThere was no statistically significant difference in adherence between the auto bilevel and CPAP groups in this study. Patients with a poor initial CPAP exposure may still achieve an acceptable long-term clinical outcome. Both groups demonstrated comparably significant improvements in functional outcomes, sleepiness, and fatigue complaints over the treatment period. CLINICAL TRIALS INFORMATION: NCT00635206 ClinicalTrials.gov

Indexed as

Patient ComplianceContinuous Positive Airway PressureDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPolysomnographySleep Apnea, ObstructiveTreatment Outcomebilevel positive airway pressurecontinuous positive airway pressurelungobstructive sleep apneaTreatment compliance

Identifiers

PMID22334808
PMCPMC3266339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.