Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22334665›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2012

N- and C-terminal domains determine differential nucleosomal binding geometry and affinity of linker histone isotypes H1(0) and H1c.

Payal Vyas, David T Brown

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Unraveling linker histone interactions in nucleosomes.Current opinion in structural biology · 2021
    Review
  4. Molecular and Cellular Functions of the Linker Histone H1.2.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Linker histones: novel insights into structure-specific recognition of the nucleosome.Biochemistry and cell biology = Biochimie et biologie cellulaire · 2017
    Review
  12. Yeast HMO1: Linker Histone Reinvented.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2017
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Nuclear and nucleolar activity of linker histone variant H1.0.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2016
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Payal VyasDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi 39216, USA.
David T Brown
University of Mississippi Medical Center · US

Funding

Training and Mentoring Core P20GM103476 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI · PI MICHAEL R GARRETT · 2012 to 2026
$60.2M
TOUGALOO PROTEOMICSP20RR016476 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI · PI SHEARER, GLEN · 2001 to 2011
$30.4M
NCRR NIH HHS 5P20RR016476-11NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016476NIGMS NIH HHS 8 P20 GM103476-11NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eukaryotic linker or H1 histones modulate DNA compaction and gene expression in vivo. In mammals, these proteins exist as multiple isotypes with distinct properties, suggesting a functional significance to the heterogeneity. Linker histones typically have a tripartite structure composed of a conserved central globular domain flanked by a highly variable short N-terminal domain and a longer highly basic C-terminal domain. We hypothesized that the variable terminal domains of individual subtypes contribute to their functional heterogeneity by influencing chromatin binding interactions. We developed a novel dual color fluorescence recovery after photobleaching assay system in which two H1 proteins fused to spectrally separable fluorescent proteins can be co-expressed and their independent binding kinetics simultaneously monitored in a single cell. This approach was combined with domain swap and point mutagenesis to determine the roles of the terminal domains in the differential binding characteristics of the linker histone isotypes, mouse H1(0) and H1c. Exchanging the N-terminal domains between H1(0) and H1c changed their overall binding affinity to that of the other variant. In contrast, switching the C-terminal domains altered the chromatin interaction surface of the globular domain. These results indicate that linker histone subtypes bind to chromatin in an intrinsically specific manner and that the highly variable terminal domains contribute to differences between subtypes. The methods developed in this study will have broad applications in studying dynamic properties of additional histone subtypes and other mobile proteins.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsBALB 3T3 CellsChromatinFluorescence Recovery After PhotobleachingHistonesKineticsMiceMicroscopy, ConfocalMolecular ConformationMolecular Sequence DataNucleosomesProtein BindingProtein IsoformsProtein Structure, TertiarySingle-Cell AnalysisChromatinHistonesNucleosomesProtein Isoforms

Identifiers

PMID22334665
PMCPMC3320926
OpenAlexW1985146942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.