Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22334455›Full record

SynthesisThe oncologist2012

Radiation-induced sarcoma of the breast: a systematic review.

Grishma R Sheth, Lee D Cranmer, Benjamin D Smith, Lauren Grasso-Lebeau, Julie E Lang

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The oncologist, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04749446 (Breast Sarcomas), which is not on this map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04749446 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Breast Sarcomas: A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Features and Outcomes

TypeobservationalSponsorItalian Sarcoma GroupRan2021 to 2026Enrolled300ConditionsBreast SarcomaArmsTreatment of Breast Sarcoma according clinical practice (includes drugs, surgery or any other received treatments)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. TRPS1 expression in breast angiosarcoma.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025
    Article
  7. Angiosarcoma: a 10-year retrospective study from a high-volume UK regional referral centre.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Grishma R ShethDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Arizona, 1501 N. Campbell Avenue, Room 4327, P.O. Box 245131, Tucson, Arizona 85724, USA.
Lee D Cranmer
Benjamin D Smith
Lauren Grasso-Lebeau
Julie E Lang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRadiation-induced sarcoma (RIS) is a rare, aggressive malignancy. Breast cancer survivors treated with radiotherapy constitute a large fraction of RIS patients. To evaluate evidenced-based practices for RIS treatment, we performed a systematic review of the published English-language literature.

methodsWe performed a systematic keyword search of PubMed for original research articles pertaining to RIS of the breast. We classified and evaluated the articles based on hierarchical levels of scientific evidence.

resultsWe identified 124 original articles available for analysis, which included 1,831 patients. No randomized controlled trials involving RIS patients were found. We present the best available evidence for the etiology, comparative biology to primary sarcoma, prognostic factors, and treatment options for RIS of the breast.

conclusionAlthough the evidence to guide clinical practice is limited to single institutional cohort studies, registry studies, case-control studies, and case reports, we applied the available evidence to address clinically relevant questions related to best practice in patient management. Surgery with widely negative margins remains the primary treatment of RIS. Unfortunately, the role of adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains uncertain. This systematic review highlights the need for additional well-designed studies to inform the management of RIS.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsRadiotherapySarcomaFemaleHumansPrognosisPubMed

Identifiers

PMID22334455
PMCPMC3316927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.