ArticleSystematic biology2012
A hierarchical Bayesian model for calibrating estimates of species divergence times.
Article in Systematic biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expectation-Maximization enables Phylogenetic Dating under a Categorical Rate Model.Systematic biology · 2024Article
- Estimating the age of the subfamily Orthocoronavirinae using host divergence times as calibration ages at two internal nodes.Virology · 2021Article
- Inferring the Total-Evidence Timescale of Marattialean Fern Evolution in the Face of Model Sensitivity.Systematic biology · 2021Article
- Log Transformation Improves Dating of Phylogenies.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Biogeographic evidence supports the Old Amazon hypothesis for the formation of the Amazon fluvial system.PeerJ · 2021Article
- Ignoring stratigraphic age uncertainty leads to erroneous estimates of species divergence times under the fossilized birth-death process.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019Article
- Article
- Article
- Bayesian Total-Evidence Dating Reveals the Recent Crown Radiation of Penguins.Systematic biology · 2017Article
- Total-Evidence Dating under the Fossilized Birth-Death Process.Systematic biology · 2016Article
- Bayesian molecular clock dating of species divergences in the genomics era.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2016Review
- The Antarctic Circumpolar Current as a diversification trigger for deep-sea octocorals.BMC evolutionary biology · 2016Article
- Biogeographic calibrations for the molecular clock.Biology letters · 2015Review
- Revisiting the origin and diversification of vascular plants through a comprehensive Bayesian analysis of the fossil record.The New phytologist · 2015Article
- Potential for bias and low precision in molecular divergence time estimation of the Canopy of Life: an example from aquatic bird families.Frontiers in genetics · 2015Article
- Probabilistic graphical model representation in phylogenetics.Systematic biology · 2014Article
- Novel non-parametric models to estimate evolutionary rates and divergence times from heterochronous sequence data.BMC evolutionary biology · 2014Article
- The fossilized birth-death process for coherent calibration of divergence-time estimates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014Article
- An improved approximate-Bayesian model-choice method for estimating shared evolutionary history.BMC evolutionary biology · 2014Article
- Rigorous approaches to species delimitation have significant implications for African crocodilian systematics and conservation.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
In Bayesian divergence time estimation methods, incorporating calibrating information from the fossil record is commonly done by assigning prior densities to ancestral nodes in the tree. Calibration prior densities are typically parametric distributions offset by minimum age estimates provided by the fossil record. Specification of the parameters of calibration densities requires the user to quantify his or her prior knowledge of the age of the ancestral node relative to the age of its calibrating fossil. The values of these parameters can, potentially, result in biased estimates of node ages if they lead to overly informative prior distributions. Accordingly, determining parameter values that lead to adequate prior densities is not straightforward. In this study, I present a hierarchical Bayesian model for calibrating divergence time analyses with multiple fossil age constraints. This approach applies a Dirichlet process prior as a hyperprior on the parameters of calibration prior densities. Specifically, this model assumes that the rate parameters of exponential prior distributions on calibrated nodes are distributed according to a Dirichlet process, whereby the rate parameters are clustered into distinct parameter categories. Both simulated and biological data are analyzed to evaluate the performance of the Dirichlet process hyperprior. Compared with fixed exponential prior densities, the hierarchical Bayesian approach results in more accurate and precise estimates of internal node ages. When this hyperprior is applied using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, the ages of calibrated nodes are sampled from mixtures of exponential distributions and uncertainty in the values of calibration density parameters is taken into account.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.