Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22334343›Full record

ArticleSystematic biology2012

A hierarchical Bayesian model for calibrating estimates of species divergence times.

Tracy A Heath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Log Transformation Improves Dating of Phylogenies.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The fossilized birth-death process for coherent calibration of divergence-time estimates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tracy A HeathDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. tracyh@berkeley.edu

Funding

Extending Bayesian Phylogenetic AnalysisR01GM069801 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO · PI HUELSENBECK, JOHN P. · 2004 to 2013
$2.1M
Bayesian Joint Estimation of Alignment and PhylogenyR01GM086887 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SUCHARD, MARC A. · 2008 to 2012
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-069801NIGMS NIH HHS GM-086887NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM069801NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086887
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Bayesian divergence time estimation methods, incorporating calibrating information from the fossil record is commonly done by assigning prior densities to ancestral nodes in the tree. Calibration prior densities are typically parametric distributions offset by minimum age estimates provided by the fossil record. Specification of the parameters of calibration densities requires the user to quantify his or her prior knowledge of the age of the ancestral node relative to the age of its calibrating fossil. The values of these parameters can, potentially, result in biased estimates of node ages if they lead to overly informative prior distributions. Accordingly, determining parameter values that lead to adequate prior densities is not straightforward. In this study, I present a hierarchical Bayesian model for calibrating divergence time analyses with multiple fossil age constraints. This approach applies a Dirichlet process prior as a hyperprior on the parameters of calibration prior densities. Specifically, this model assumes that the rate parameters of exponential prior distributions on calibrated nodes are distributed according to a Dirichlet process, whereby the rate parameters are clustered into distinct parameter categories. Both simulated and biological data are analyzed to evaluate the performance of the Dirichlet process hyperprior. Compared with fixed exponential prior densities, the hierarchical Bayesian approach results in more accurate and precise estimates of internal node ages. When this hyperprior is applied using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, the ages of calibrated nodes are sampled from mixtures of exponential distributions and uncertainty in the values of calibration density parameters is taken into account.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremEvolution, MolecularFossilsModels, GeneticPhylogenyAnimalsCell NucleusComputer SimulationMarkov ChainsMitochondrial ProteinsMonte Carlo MethodTurtlesMitochondrial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22334343
PMCPMC3417043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.