Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22333915›Full record

ArticleThe EMBO journal2012

DNA replication stress differentially regulates G1/S genes via Rad53-dependent inactivation of Nrm1.

Anna Travesa, Dwight Kuo, Robertus A M de Bruin, Tatyana I Kalashnikova, Marisela Guaderrama, Kevin Thai, Aaron Aslanian, Marcus B Smolka, John R Yates, Trey Ideker and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EMBO journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Transcriptional Profiling of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. DNA damage checkpoint and repair: From the budding yeastComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Checkpoint Responses to DNA Double-Strand Breaks.Annual review of biochemistry · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anna TravesaDepartment of Molecular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Dwight Kuo
Robertus A M de Bruin
Tatyana I Kalashnikova
Marisela Guaderrama
Kevin Thai
Aaron Aslanian
Marcus B Smolka
John R Yates
Trey Ideker
Curt Wittenberg
Scripps Research Institute · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USCornell University · USLa Jolla Bioengineering Institute · US

Funding

ZDS2P REGULATES SWE1P-DEPENDENT POLARIZED CELL GROWTH IN S CEREVISIAEP41RR011823 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DAVIS, TRACY · 1996 to 2011
$24.7M
SYNTHETIC SYSTEMSP50GM085764 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI HASTY, JEFF M, IDEKER, TREY · 2010 to 2018
$23.3M
REGULATION OF G1-SPECIFIC GENE EXPRESSION IN YEASTR01GM059441 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI WITTENBERG, CURT · 2000 to 2016
$6.9M
Comparative Analysis of Genetic Interaction NetworksR01GM084279 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI IDEKER, TREY, KROGAN, NEVAN J · 2008 to 2017
$3.9M
Medical Research Council G0800297NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR011823NIGMS NIH HHS GM084279NIGMS NIH HHS GM085764NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM085764NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059441NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MBF and SBF transcription factors regulate a large family of coordinately expressed G1/S genes required for early cell-cycle functions including DNA replication and repair. SBF is inactivated upon S-phase entry by Clb/CDK whereas MBF targets are repressed by the co-repressor, Nrm1. Using genome-wide expression analysis of cells treated with methyl methane sulfonate (MMS), hydroxyurea (HU) or camptothecin (CPT), we show that genotoxic stress during S phase specifically induces MBF-regulated genes. This occurs via direct phosphorylation of Nrm1 by Rad53, the effector checkpoint kinase, which prevents its binding to MBF target promoters. We conclude that MBF-regulated genes are distinguished from SBF-regulated genes by their sensitivity to activation by the S-phase checkpoint, thereby, providing an effective mechanism for enhancing DNA replication and repair and promoting genome stability.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationGene Expression Regulation, FungalCamptothecinCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 2DNA DamageG1 PhaseHydroxyureaMethyl MethanesulfonateMutagensPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRepressor ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsS PhaseCamptothecinCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 2HydroxyureaMethyl MethanesulfonateMutagensNrm1 protein, S cerevisiaeProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRAD53 protein, S cerevisiaeRepressor ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID22333915
PMCPMC3321207
OpenAlexW2139455557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.