Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22333675›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2012

Ex vivo activity of the ACT new components pyronaridine and piperaquine in comparison with conventional ACT drugs against isolates of Plasmodium falciparum.

Aurélie Pascual, Philippe Parola, Françoise Benoit-Vical, Fabrice Simon, Denis Malvy, Stéphane Picot, Pascal Delaunay, Didier Basset, Danièle Maubon, Bernard Faugère and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Ex vivo Sensitivity Profile ofInfection and drug resistance · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Influence of theThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.

Aurélie PascualUnité de Recherche en Biologie et Epidémiologie Parasitaires Unité de Recherche pour les Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales Emergentes UMR-6236, Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées, Allée du Médecin-colonel Jamot,-BP 60109, 13262 Marseille Cedex, France.
Philippe Parola
Françoise Benoit-Vical
Fabrice Simon
Denis Malvy
Stéphane Picot
Pascal Delaunay
Didier Basset
Danièle Maubon
Bernard Faugère
Guillaume Ménard
Nathalie Bourgeois
Claude Oeuvray
Eric Didillon
Christophe Rogier
Bruno Pradines
Unité de Recherche sur les Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales Emergentes · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse · FRHôpital de la Timone · FRHôpital d'Instruction des Armées Sainte-Anne · FRHôpital Lapeyronie · FRHôpital l'Archet · FRHôpital Laveran · FRHôpital Nord · FRMedicines for Malaria Venture · CHUniversité de Lyon · FRUniversité Grenoble Alpes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the present work was to assess i) ex vivo activity of pyronaridine (PND) and piperaquine (PPQ), as new components of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT), to define susceptibility baseline, ii) their activities compared to other partner drugs, namely monodesethylamodiaquine (MDAQ), lumefantrine (LMF), mefloquine (MQ), artesunate (AS) and dihydroartemisinin (DHA) against 181 Plasmodium falciparum isolates from African countries, India and Thailand, and iii) in vitro cross-resistance with other quinoline drugs, chloroquine (CQ) or quinine (QN).

methodsThe susceptibility of the 181 P. falciparum isolates to the nine anti-malarial drugs was assessed using the standard 42-hours 3H-hypoxanthine uptake inhibition method.

resultsThe IC50 values for PND ranged from 0.55 to 80.0 nM (geometric mean = 19.9 nM) and from 11.8 to 217.3 nM for PPQ (geometric mean = 66.8 nM). A significant positive correlation was shown between responses to PPQ and PND responses (rho = 0.46) and between PPQ and MDAQ (rho = 0.30). No significant correlation was shown between PPQ IC50 and responses to other anti-malarial drugs. A significant positive correlation was shown between responses to PND and MDAQ (rho = 0.37), PND and LMF (rho = 0.28), PND and QN (rho = 0.24), PND and AS (rho = 0.19), PND and DHA (rho = 0.18) and PND and CQ (rho = 0.16). All these coefficients of correlation are too low to suggest cross-resistance between PPQ or PND and the other drugs.

conclusionsIn this study, the excellent anti-malarial activity of PPQ and PND was confirmed. The absence of cross-resistance with quinolines and artemisinin derivatives is consistent with the efficacy of the combinations of PPQ and DHA or PND and AS in areas where parasites are resistant to conventional anti-malarial drugs.

Indexed as

AfricaAntimalarialsDrug ResistanceHumansHypoxanthineIndiaInhibitory Concentration 50NaphthyridinesParasitic Sensitivity TestsPiperazinesPlasmodium falciparumQuinolinesThailandTritiumAntimalarialsHypoxanthineNaphthyridinespiperaquinePiperazinespyronaridineQuinolinesTritium

Identifiers

PMID22333675
PMCPMC3305508
OpenAlexW2040200545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.