ReviewExpert opinion on pharmacotherapy2012
Antituberculosis therapy for 2012 and beyond.
Review in Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Geographical evolutionary pathway of global tuberculosis incidence trends.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Roles of cysteine in the structure and metabolic function ofRSC advances · 2022Article
- Comparative efficacy and acceptability of five anti-tubercular drugs in treatment of multidrug resistant tuberculosis: a network meta-analysis.Journal of clinical bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Review
- Adherence and health care costs.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2014Review
- In vitro anti-mycobacterial activity of nine medicinal plants used by ethnic groups in Sonora, Mexico.BMC complementary and alternative medicine · 2013Article
- Targeting the mycobacterial envelope for tuberculosis drug development.Expert review of anti-infective therapy · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionIn terms of human suffering, tuberculosis has a huge impact on global society, making it arguably the most important infectious disease in history. Despite the devastating impact on society, the tools to fight tuberculosis are very limited. Current standard therapy has been used for over 40 years and threats, such as the HIV epidemic and drug-resistant strains, undermine efforts to control the disease. New drugs are needed to address the challenges faced globally. AREAS COVERED: Current therapy is briefly reviewed in this paper and then new doses and combinations of existing drugs are presented. New candidate drugs are also discussed, along with the potential benefits and pitfalls of each of the compounds and approaches to therapy. EXPERT OPINION: Despite the need to develop new drugs, the ability of programs to deliver existing therapies must not be neglected. Directly observed therapy and a standard basic level of care for all patients with tuberculosis, regardless of where they reside, is imperative, and will ensure that new drugs and regimens will have the greatest possible impact. New combination regimens, including PA 824 and TMC207, in combination with existing drugs, are very exciting - not only because of their ability to shorten treatment regimens in pan-susceptible cases, but also because they can be used among drug-resistant strains. Although an effective vaccine will probably be necessary to eliminate tuberculosis, new drugs and combination regimens have the potential to save millions of lives before tuberculosis is finally eliminated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.