ReviewAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2011
Translational regulation in nutrigenomics.
Review in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Editorial: Exploring nutrigenomics in managing metabolic inflammation.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Mmp12 Is Translationally Regulated in Macrophages during the Course of Inflammation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Nutritional epigenomic and DNA-damage modulation effect of natural stilbenoids.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Polymorphisms, diet and nutrigenomics.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2022Review
- Nutrition and Rheumatoid Arthritis in the 'Omics' Era.Nutrients · 2021Review
- Stress Response and Adaptation Mediated by Amino Acid Misincorporation during Protein Synthesis.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2016Review
- Milk--A Nutrient System of Mammalian Evolution Promoting mTORC1-Dependent Translation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2015Review
- Profiling of the fetal and adult rat liver transcriptome and translatome reveals discordant regulation by the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR).American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2015Article
- Nutrigenomics: definitions and advances of this new science.Journal of nutrition and metabolism · 2014Review
- Situating Nutri-Ethics at the Junction of Nutrigenomics and Nutriproteomics in Postgenomics Medicine.Current pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The emergence of genome-wide analysis to interrogate cellular DNA, RNA, and protein content has revolutionized the study of the control network that mediates cellular homeostasis. Nutrigenomics addresses the effect of nutrients on gene expression, which provides a basis for understanding the biological activity of dietary components. Translation of mRNAs represents the last step of genetic flow and primarily defines the proteome. Translational regulation is thus critical for gene expression, in particular, under nutrient excess or deficiency. Until recently, it was unclear how the global effects of translational control are influenced by nutrient signaling. An emerging concept of translational reprogramming addresses how to maintain the expression of specific proteins during pathophysiological conditions by translation of selective mRNAs. Here we describe recent advances in our understanding of translational control, nutrient signaling, and their dysregulation in aging and cancer. The mechanistic understanding of translational regulation in response to different nutrient conditions may help identify potential dietary and therapeutic targets to improve human health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.