Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22331911›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012

Transgene-mediated cosuppression and RNA interference enhance germ-line apoptosis in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Adele Adamo, Alexander Woglar, Nicola Silva, Alexandra Penkner, Verena Jantsch, Adriana La Volpe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Lack of pairing during meiosis triggers multigenerational transgene silencing in Caenorhabditis elegans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  7. Autophagy protects C. elegans against necrosis during Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Adele AdamoConsiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche-Institute of Genetics and Biophysics A. Buzzati-Traverso, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Alexander Woglar
Nicola Silva
Alexandra Penkner
Verena Jantsch
Adriana La Volpe
Institute of Genetics and Biophysics · ITUniversity of Vienna · ATMax Perutz Labs · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 21338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction of multiple copies of a germ-line-expressed gene elicits silencing of the corresponding endogenous gene during Caenorhabditis elegans oogenesis; this process is referred to as germ-line cosuppression. Transformed plasmids assemble into extrachromosomal arrays resembling extra minichromosomes with repetitive structures. Loss of the transgene extrachromosomal array leads to reversion of the silencing phenomenon. Cosuppression and RNAi depend upon some of the same genes. In the C. elegans germ line, about half the cells undergo a physiological programmed cell death that shares most genetic requirements with somatic apoptosis. In addition, apoptosis is stimulated by DNA damage and synaptic failure mediated through different apoptotic checkpoints. We found that both germ-line cosuppression and RNAi of germ-line-expressed genes enhance apoptosis during C. elegans oogenesis. In contrast, apoptosis is not enhanced by extrachromosomal arrays carrying genes not driven by germ-line-specific promoters that thus do not elicit transgene-mediated cosuppression/silencing. Similarly, introduction of doubled-stranded RNA that shares no homology with endogenous genes has no effect on apoptosis. "Silencing-induced apoptosis" is dependent upon sir-2.1 and cep-1 (the worm p53 ortholog), and is accompanied by a rise in RAD-51 foci, a marker for ongoing DNA repair, indicating induction of DNA double-strand breaks. This finding suggests that the DNA damage-response pathway is involved. RNAi and cosuppression have been postulated as defense mechanisms against genomic intruders. We speculate that the mechanism here described may trigger the elimination of germ cells that have undergone viral infection or transposon activation.

Indexed as

RNA InterferenceAnimalsApoptosisCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsDNA RepairExtrachromosomal InheritanceGene DosageGerm CellsGerm-Line MutationMeiosisMutagenesis, InsertionalPlasmidsRad51 RecombinaseRNA, Double-StrandedSirtuinsCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsCEP-1 protein, C elegansrad-51 protein, C elegansRad51 RecombinaseRNA, Double-StrandedSIR-2.1 protein, C elegansSirtuinsTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID22331911
PMCPMC3295272
OpenAlexW2056814098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.