Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22331885›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012

Unified quantitative model of AMPA receptor trafficking at synapses.

Katalin Czöndör, Magali Mondin, Mikael Garcia, Martin Heine, Renato Frischknecht, Daniel Choquet, Jean-Baptiste Sibarita, Olivier R Thoumine

Open access · bronzeAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Katalin CzöndörInterdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, University of Bordeaux, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
Magali Mondin
Mikael Garcia
Martin Heine
Renato Frischknecht
Daniel Choquet
Jean-Baptiste Sibarita
Olivier R Thoumine
Université de Bordeaux · FRLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology · DEInstitut Interdisciplinaire de Neuroscience · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trafficking of AMPA receptors (AMPARs) plays a key role in synaptic transmission. However, a general framework integrating the two major mechanisms regulating AMPAR delivery at postsynapses (i.e., surface diffusion and internal recycling) is lacking. To this aim, we built a model based on numerical trajectories of individual AMPARs, including free diffusion in the extrasynaptic space, confinement in the synapse, and trapping at the postsynaptic density (PSD) through reversible interactions with scaffold proteins. The AMPAR/scaffold kinetic rates were adjusted by comparing computer simulations to single-particle tracking and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching experiments in primary neurons, in different conditions of synapse density and maturation. The model predicts that the steady-state AMPAR number at synapses is bidirectionally controlled by AMPAR/scaffold binding affinity and PSD size. To reveal the impact of recycling processes in basal conditions and upon synaptic potentiation or depression, spatially and temporally defined exocytic and endocytic events were introduced. The model predicts that local recycling of AMPARs close to the PSD, coupled to short-range surface diffusion, provides rapid control of AMPAR number at synapses. In contrast, because of long-range diffusion limitations, extrasynaptic recycling is intrinsically slower and less synapse-specific. Thus, by discriminating the relative contributions of AMPAR diffusion, trapping, and recycling events on spatial and temporal bases, this model provides unique insights on the dynamic regulation of synaptic strength.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, NeurologicalProtein TransportAnimalsBinding, CompetitiveDiffusionEndocytosisExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsFluorescence Recovery After PhotobleachingHippocampusMembranesMicrofilament ProteinsNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsPost-Synaptic DensityProtein Bindingglutamate receptor ionotropic, AMPA 2Microfilament ProteinsReceptors, AMPARecombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22331885
PMCPMC3295262
OpenAlexW2091849927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.