Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22331456›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2013

Impact of national smoke-free legislation on home smoking bans: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project Europe Surveys.

Ute Mons, Gera E Nagelhout, Shane Allwright, Romain Guignard, Bas van den Putte, Marc C Willemsen, Geoffrey T Fong, Hermann Brenner, Martina Pötschke-Langer, Lutz P Breitling

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 141 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Vaping in a Time of Pandemics: Risk Perception and Motivations for Electronic Cigarette Use.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Impact of an Inner-City Smoke-Free Zone on Outdoor Smoking Patterns: A Before-After Study.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Ute MonsGerman Cancer Research Center, Unit Cancer Prevention and WHO Collaborating Centre for Tobacco Control, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. u.mons@dkfz.de
Gera E Nagelhout
Shane Allwright
Romain Guignard
Bas van den Putte
Marc C Willemsen
Geoffrey T Fong
Hermann Brenner
Martina Pötschke-Langer
Lutz P Breitling
German Cancer Research Center · DEHeidelberg University · DEMaastricht University · NLInstitut National de Prévention et d’Education pour la Santé · FRTrinity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Waterloo · CA

Funding

Variation in Cigarettes, Tobacco use Behaviors and Exposures in ITC CountriesP01CA138389 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI CUMMINGS, KENNETH MICHAEL · 2009 to 2013
$13.4M
Project 3: Policy Effects on Cigarette Design, Emissions &BehaviorP50CA111236 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI CUMMINGS, KENNETH MICHAEL · 2004 to 2009
$8.2M
International Tobacco Policy SurveyR01CA100362 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO · PI FONG, GEOFFREY T · 2005 to 2013
$4.7M
Effects of Graphic Warning Labels on Adolescent SmokingR01CA090955 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO · PI FONG, GEOFFREY T · 2002 to 2004
$369k
Cancer Research UK C312/A6465CIHR 57897CIHR 79551NCI NIH HHS P01 CA138389NCI NIH HHS P50 CA111236NCI NIH HHS R01 CA090955NCI NIH HHS R01 CA100362NCI NIH HHS R01 CA90955
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo measure changes in prevalence and predictors of home smoking bans (HSBs) among smokers in four European countries after the implementation of national smoke-free legislation.

designTwo waves of the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project Europe Surveys, which is a prospective panel study. Pre- and post-legislation data were used from Ireland, France, Germany and the Netherlands. Two pre-legislation waves from the UK were used as control.

participants4634 respondents from the intervention countries and 1080 from the control country completed both baseline and follow-up and were included in the present analyses.

methodsMultiple logistic regression models to identify predictors of having or of adopting a total HSB, and Generalised Estimating Equation models to compare patterns of change after implementation of smoke-free legislation to a control country without such legislation.

resultsMost smokers had at least partial smoking restrictions in their home, but the proportions varied significantly between countries. After implementation of national smoke-free legislation, the proportion of smokers with a total HSB increased significantly in all four countries. Among continuing smokers, the number of cigarettes smoked per day either remained stable or decreased significantly. Multiple logistic regression models indicated that having a young child in the household and supporting smoking bans in bars were important correlates of having a pre-legislation HSB. Prospective predictors of imposing a HSB between survey waves were planning to quit smoking, supporting a total smoking ban in bars and the birth of a child. Generalised Estimating Equation models indicated that the change in total HSB in the intervention countries was greater than that in the control country.

conclusionsThe findings suggest that smoke-free legislation does not lead to more smoking in smokers' homes. On the contrary, our findings demonstrate that smoke-free legislation may stimulate smokers to establish total smoking bans in their homes.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAir Pollution, IndoorEuropeFamily HealthHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMiddle AgedMotivationProspective StudiesSmoke-Free PolicySmokingSmoking CessationSmoking PreventionTobacco Smoke PollutionTobacco Smoke Pollutionadvocacycessationenvironmental tobacco smokehome smoking restrictionsImpact of smoke-free legislationpackaging and labellingprevalencepreventionprospective studypsychosocial theoriespublic opinionpublic policyresearch methodssecond-hand smokesmoking-caused diseasesocial psychologysocioeconomic statussurveillance and monitoring

Identifiers

PMID22331456
PMCPMC4010876
OpenAlexW2121857669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.