ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2012
Efficacy of human simulated exposures of ceftaroline against phenotypically diverse Enterobacteriaceae isolates.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- PK-PD Compass: bringing infectious diseases pharmacometrics to the patient's bedside.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2017Article
- Review
- Review
- Review
- Experimental model for treatment of extended spectrum betalactamase producing-Klebsiella pneumoniae.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ceftaroline fosamil, a new broad-spectrum cephalosporin, exhibits potent bactericidal activity against common Gram-negative pathogens, including Enterobacteriaceae, and Gram-positive pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a human simulated dose of ceftaroline fosamil against clinical Enterobacteriaceae in both neutropenic and immunocompetent mouse thigh infection models. Thirty-five Enterobacteriaceae isolates with ceftaroline MICs ranging from 0.25 to 32 μg/ml were selected for the neutropenic model, and five Escherichia coli isolates were also tested in the immunocompetent model. Two hours after inoculation, the ceftaroline fosamil human simulated regimen of 600 mg intravenously (i.v.) every 12 h was administered. The change in log(10) CFU after 24 h was compared to that in 0 h controls. The human simulated regimen produced predictable efficacy against 18 of 20 isolates with a MIC of ≤ 1 μg/ml. Similar efficacy was seen in the immunocompetent model against isolates with a MIC of ≤ 2 μg/ml, and enhanced efficacy was observed against the isolate with a MIC of 4 μg/ml. Human simulated exposures to ceftaroline fosamil at 600 mg every 12 h provided predictable efficacy against Enterobacteriaceae with MICs of ≤ 1 μg/ml and enhanced efficacy within the immunocompetent model, supporting the clinical utility of ceftaroline fosamil against these organisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.