ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2012
Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in clinical trials of antivascular therapies.
Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 175 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
175 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of MRI for assessing axillary lymph node status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2024Pooled it
- Perfusion MRI as the predictive/prognostic and pharmacodynamic biomarkers in recurrent malignant glioma treated with bevacizumab: a systematic review and a time-to-event meta-analysis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2016Pooled it
- Assessment of blood-brain barrier disruption using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. A systematic review.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2014Pooled it
- Plasma Tie2 is a tumor vascular response biomarker for VEGF inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer.Nature communications · 2018Trial
- The prognostic and predictive value of vascular response parameters measured by dynamic contrast-enhanced-CT, -MRI and -US in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving sunitinib.European radiology · 2018Trial
- A pilot study to determine the timing and effect of bevacizumab on vascular normalization of metastatic brain tumors in breast cancer.BMC cancer · 2016Trial
- Perfusion parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging predict outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma receiving radiotherapy with or without thalidomide.Hepatology international · 2015Trial
- Trial
- Phase I and pharmacodynamic study of high-dose NGR-hTNF in patients with refractory solid tumours.British journal of cancer · 2013Trial
- SORDINO: silent, sensitive, specific and artifact-resistant fMRI in awake, behaving mice.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- Optimized Detection of Left Ventricular Hyperpolarized [1-Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- The diagnostic and prognosis value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI distributed parameter model andNeuroradiology · 2026Article
- Longitudinal wash-in slope changes on dynamic contrast enhancement MRI for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.European radiology · 2026Article
- Application value of gastric contrast ultrasonography in gastric tumors.Insights into imaging · 2026Review
- Tumor Microenvironment: Insights from Multiparametric MRI in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Cancers · 2026Article
- 3D-printable phantoms for quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Measuring repeatability of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI biomarkers improves evaluation of biological response to radiotherapy in lung cancer.European radiology · 2025Article
- Performance of recurrent neural networks with Monte Carlo dropout for predicting pharmacokinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging data.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Editorial: Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging: technology progress and clinical application in oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- The diagnostic value of advanced tracer kinetic models in evaluating high grade gliomas recurrence and treatment response using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
115 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
About 100 early-phase clinical trials and investigator-led studies of targeted antivascular therapies--both anti-angiogenic and vascular-targeting agents--have reported data derived from T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI. However, the role of DCE-MRI for decision making during the drug-development process remains controversial. Despite well-documented guidelines on image acquisition and analysis, several key questions concerning the role of this technique in early-phase trial design remain unanswered. This Review describes studies of single-agent antivascular therapies, in which DCE-MRI parameters are incorporated as pharmacodynamic biomarkers. We discuss whether these parameters, such as volume transfer constant (K(trans)), are reproducible and reliable biomarkers of both drug efficacy and proof of concept, and whether they assist in dose selection and drug scheduling for subsequent phase II trials. Emerging evidence indicates that multiparametric analysis of DCE-MRI data offers greater insight into the mechanism of drug action than studies measuring a single parameter, such as K(trans). We also provide an overview of current data and appraise the future directions of this technique in oncology trials. Finally, major hurdles in imaging biomarker development, validation and qualification that hinder a wide application of DCE-MRI techniques in clinical trials are addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22330689What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.