Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22330242›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomedical science2012

Cardiac and vascular phenotypes in the apolipoprotein E-deficient mouse.

Elisardo C Vasquez, Veronica A Peotta, Agata L Gava, Thiago Mc Pereira, Silvana S Meyrelles

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomedical science, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Experimental animal models of chronic inflammation.Current research in immunology · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Guidelines on models of diabetic heart disease.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elisardo C VasquezDepartment of Physiological Sciences, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitoria, ES, Brazil. evasquez@pq.cnpq.br
Veronica A Peotta
Agata L Gava
Thiago Mc Pereira
Silvana S Meyrelles
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo · BRUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular death is frequently associated with atherosclerosis, a chronic multifactorial disease and a leading cause of death worldwide. Genetically engineered mouse models have proven useful for the study of the mechanisms underlying cardiovascular diseases. The apolipoprotein E-deficient mouse has been the most widely used animal model of atherosclerosis because it rapidly develops severe hypercholesterolemia and spontaneous atherosclerotic lesions similar to those observed in humans. In this review, we provide an overview of the cardiac and vascular phenotypes and discuss the interplay among nitric oxide, reactive oxygen species, aging and diet in the impairment of cardiovascular function in this mouse model.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsApolipoproteins EAtherosclerosisBlood VesselsDietDisease Models, AnimalHeartHemodynamicsHyperlipoproteinemia Type IIIMiceNitric OxideReactive Oxygen SpeciesApolipoproteins ENitric OxideReactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID22330242
PMCPMC3306747
OpenAlexW2159292622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.