Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22330032›Full record

ReviewAnnals of surgery2012

Regenerative medicine as applied to general surgery.

Giuseppe Orlando, Kathryn J Wood, Paolo De Coppi, Pedro M Baptista, Kyle W Binder, Khalil N Bitar, Christopher Breuer, Luke Burnett, George Christ, Alan Farney and 19 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of surgery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
17.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Urine-derived cells for human cell therapy.Stem cell research & therapy · 2018
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Whole Organ Tissue Vascularization: Engineering the Tree to Develop the Fruits.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2018
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Giuseppe OrlandoWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA. gorlando@wakehealth.edu
Kathryn J Wood
Paolo De Coppi
Pedro M Baptista
Kyle W Binder
Khalil N Bitar
Christopher Breuer
Luke Burnett
George Christ
Alan Farney
Marina Figliuzzi
James H Holmes
Kenneth Koch
Paolo Macchiarini
Sayed-Hadi Mirmalek Sani
Emmanuel Opara
Andrea Remuzzi
Jeffrey Rogers
Justin M Saul
Dror Seliktar
Keren Shapira-Schweitzer
Tom Smith
Daniel Solomon
Mark Van Dyke
James J Yoo
Yuanyuan Zhang
Anthony Atala
Robert J Stratta
Shay Soker
Wake Forest University · USForest Institute · USNHS Blood and Transplant · GBBurn Institute · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Restoration of Fecal Continence in Aging IASR01DK071614 · NIDDK · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BITAR, KHALIL N · 2008 to 2012
$1.6M
Bioengineering A Bioartificial PancreasR01DK080897 · NIDDK · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI OPARA, EMMANUEL C. · 2009 to 2010
$1.0M
Implantation of physiologically functional bioengineered innervated IAS constructRC1DK087151 · NIDDK · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BITAR, KHALIL N · 2009 to 2010
$994k
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK071614NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK080897NIDDK NIH HHS RC1 DK087151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present review illustrates the state of the art of regenerative medicine (RM) as applied to surgical diseases and demonstrates that this field has the potential to address some of the unmet needs in surgery. RM is a multidisciplinary field whose purpose is to regenerate in vivo or ex vivo human cells, tissues, or organs to restore or establish normal function through exploitation of the potential to regenerate, which is intrinsic to human cells, tissues, and organs. RM uses cells and/or specially designed biomaterials to reach its goals and RM-based therapies are already in use in several clinical trials in most fields of surgery. The main challenges for investigators are threefold: Creation of an appropriate microenvironment ex vivo that is able to sustain cell physiology and function in order to generate the desired cells or body parts; identification and appropriate manipulation of cells that have the potential to generate parenchymal, stromal and vascular components on demand, both in vivo and ex vivo; and production of smart materials that are able to drive cell fate.

Indexed as

Regenerative MedicineAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBlood Vessel ProsthesisCell TransplantationChondroitin SulfatesCollagenDermatologic Surgical ProceduresGastrointestinal TractGeneral SurgeryHeart FailureHumansKidney Failure, ChronicLarynxLiver TransplantationRespiratory Tract DiseasesBiocompatible MaterialsChondroitin SulfatesCollagenintegra artificial skin

Identifiers

PMID22330032
PMCPMC3327776
OpenAlexW1969065136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.