ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2012
Segmental duplication, microinversion, and gene loss associated with a complex inversion breakpoint region in Drosophila.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inversions maintain differences between migratory phenotypes of a songbird.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Recurrent chromosome reshuffling and the evolution of neo-sex chromosomes in parrots.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Characteristics and possible mechanisms of formation of microinversions distinguishing human and chimpanzee genomes.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Genomic diversity of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis: pangenomic approach for highlighting unique genomic features with newly constructed complete genomes.Veterinary research · 2021Article
- The evolution of insect metallothioneins.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2020Article
- Fine-Scale Position Effects Shape the Distribution of Inversion Breakpoints in Drosophila melanogaster.Genome biology and evolution · 2020Article
- The Genomic Complexity of a Large Inversion in Great Tits.Genome biology and evolution · 2019Article
- How chromosomal rearrangements shape adaptation and speciation: Case studies in Drosophila pseudoobscura and its sibling species Drosophila persimilis.Molecular ecology · 2019Article
- The molecular characterization of fixed inversions breakpoints unveils the ancestral character of the Drosophila guanche chromosomal arrangements.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Muller "Elements" inGenetics · 2018Article
- The origin of chromosomal inversions as a source of segmental duplications in the Sophophora subgenus of Drosophila.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- A molecular perspective on a complex polymorphic inversion system with cytological evidence of multiply reused breakpoints.Heredity · 2015Article
- Genomics of ecological adaptation in cactophilic Drosophila.Genome biology and evolution · 2014Article
- Chromosomal evolution in the Drosophila cardini group (Diptera: Drosophilidae): photomaps and inversion analysis.Genetica · 2014Article
- Adaptation through chromosomal inversions in Anopheles.Frontiers in genetics · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chromosomal inversions are usually portrayed as simple two-breakpoint rearrangements changing gene order but not gene number or structure. However, increasing evidence suggests that inversion breakpoints may often have a complex structure and entail gene duplications with potential functional consequences. Here, we used a combination of different techniques to investigate the breakpoint structure and the functional consequences of a complex rearrangement fixed in Drosophila buzzatii and comprising two tandemly arranged inversions sharing the middle breakpoint: 2m and 2n. By comparing the sequence in the breakpoint regions between D. buzzatii (inverted chromosome) and D. mojavensis (noninverted chromosome), we corroborate the breakpoint reuse at the molecular level and infer that inversion 2m was associated with a duplication of a ~13 kb segment and likely generated by staggered breaks plus repair by nonhomologous end joining. The duplicated segment contained the gene CG4673, involved in nuclear transport, and its two nested genes CG5071 and CG5079. Interestingly, we found that other than the inversion and the associated duplication, both breakpoints suffered additional rearrangements, that is, the proximal breakpoint experienced a microinversion event associated at both ends with a 121-bp long duplication that contains a promoter. As a consequence of all these different rearrangements, CG5079 has been lost from the genome, CG5071 is now a single copy nonnested gene, and CG4673 has a transcript ~9 kb shorter and seems to have acquired a more complex gene regulation. Our results illustrate the complex effects of chromosomal rearrangements and highlight the need of complementing genomic approaches with detailed sequence-level and functional analyses of breakpoint regions if we are to fully understand genome structure, function, and evolutionary dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.