Trial reportLearning & behavior2012
Decision making by humans in a behavioral task: do humans, like pigeons, show suboptimal choice?
Trial report in Learning & behavior, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of methamphetamine on signalled probability in rats using concurrent chains.Psychopharmacology · 2026Article
- A Common Stay-on-Goal Mechanism in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex for Information and Effort Choices.eNeuro · 2025Article
- Rats' performance in a suboptimal choice procedure implemented in a natural-foraging analogue.Animal cognition · 2024Article
- The effect of noninstrumental information on reward learning.Memory & cognition · 2024Article
- Human Behavior in Suboptimal Choice Tasks: Defining Optimality.Perspectives on behavior science · 2024Article
- On the value of advanced information about delayed rewards.Animal cognition · 2024Article
- Pavlovian learning and conditioned reinforcement.Journal of applied behavior analysis · 2023Article
- Outcome expectancy and suboptimal risky choice in nonhuman primates.Learning & behavior · 2020Article
- Human Choice Predicted by Obtained Reinforcers, Not by Reinforcement Predictors.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Human and pigeon suboptimal choice.Learning & behavior · 2019Article
- No Effect of Ego Depletion on Risk Taking.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- The role of 'jackpot' stimuli in maladaptive decision-making: dissociable effects of D1/D2 receptor agonists and antagonists.Psychopharmacology · 2018Article
- Gambling in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): The effect of cues signaling risky choice outcomes.Learning & behavior · 2017Article
- Gambling-like behavior in pigeons: 'jackpot' signals promote maladaptive risky choice.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Suboptimal choice in rats: Incentive salience attribution promotes maladaptive decision-making.Behavioural brain research · 2017Article
- How suboptimal is suboptimal choice?Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2017Article
- Article
- Article
- Initial uncertainty in Pavlovian reward prediction persistently elevates incentive salience and extends sign-tracking to normally unattractive cues.Behavioural brain research · 2014Article
- Suboptimal choice by pigeons: an analog of human gambling behavior.Behavioural processes · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Consistent with human gambling behavior but contrary to optimal foraging theory, pigeons show a strong preference for an alternative with low probability and high payoff (a gambling-like alternative) over an alternative with a greater net payoff (Zentall & Stagner, Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 278, 1203-1208, 2011). In the present research, we asked whether humans would show suboptimal choice on a task involving choices with probabilities similar to those for pigeons. In Experiment 1, when we selected participants on the basis of their self-reported gambling activities, we found a significantly greater choice of the alternative involving low probability and high payoff (gambling-like alternative) than for a group that reported an absence of gambling activity. In Experiment 2, we found that when the inhibiting abilities of typical humans were impaired by a self-regulatory depletion manipulation, they were more likely to choose the gambling-like alternative. Taken together, the results suggest that this task is suitable for the comparative study of suboptimal decision-making behavior and the mechanisms that underlie it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22328280What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.