Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22327882›Full record

ReviewTargeted oncology2012

Targeting regulatory T cells.

Christine Ménétrier-Caux, Tyler Curiel, Julien Faget, Manuarii Manuel, Christophe Caux, Weiping Zou

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Targeted oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Towards tumor immunodiagnostics.Annals of translational medicine · 2016
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Sialic acid-modified antigens impose tolerance via inhibition of T-cell proliferation and de novo induction of regulatory T cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Christine Ménétrier-CauxUniversité de Lyon, F-69000, Lyon, France. christine.caux@lyon.unicancer.fr
Tyler Curiel
Julien Faget
Manuarii Manuel
Christophe Caux
Weiping Zou
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCentre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancers express tumor-associated antigens that should elicit immune response to antagonize the tumor growth, but spontaneous immune rejection of established cancer is rare, suggesting an immunosuppressive environment hindering host antitumor immunity. Among the specific and active tumor-mediated mechanisms, CD4(+)CD25(high) T regulatory cells (Treg) are important mediators of active immune evasion in cancer. In this review, we will discuss Treg subpopulations and the mechanisms of their suppressive functions. Treg depletion improves endogenous antitumor immunity and the efficacy of active immunotherapy in animal models for cancer, suggesting that inhibiting Treg function could also improve the limited successes of human cancer immunotherapy. We will also discuss specific strategies for devising effective cancer immunotherapy targeting Treg.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CommunicationHumansImmunosuppression TherapyLymphocyte DepletionNeoplasmsT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryT-Lymphocyte SubsetsTumor EscapeTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID22327882
OpenAlexW1994296136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.