Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22327734›Full record

SynthesisCurrent opinion in obstetrics & gynecology2012

Vitamin D in pregnancy: current concepts.

Rachel P Urrutia, John M Thorp

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02920593 (A Randomized Control Trial of Vitamin D Prophylaxis in the Prevention of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02920593 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Control Trial of Vitamin D Prophylaxis in the Prevention of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy

TypeinterventionalSponsorStony Brook UniversityRan2016 to 2019Enrolled412ConditionsGestational Hypertension, Toxemia, Superimposed Preeclampsia, EclampsiaArmsVitamin D3
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Newborn vitamin D levels in relation to autism spectrum disorders and intellectual disability: A case-control study in california.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rachel P UrrutiaDivision of Women's Primary Care, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. rmpera@gmail.com
John M Thorp
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Carolina Population CenterR24HD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MORGAN, SAMUEL PHILIP · 2005 to 2014
$10.0M
Training in Epidemiology and Clinical Trials (TECT)T32HD040672 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BOGGESS, KIM A · 2001 to 2015
$4.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD050924NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD040672NICHD NIH HHS T32HD040672NIMHD NIH HHS L60 MD006622
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewVitamin D is part of a complex steroid hormone system long known to be involved in bone metabolism. Recently, vitamin D has been implicated in physiologic processes as diverse as vascular health, immune function, metabolism and placental function. This review summarizes the current evidence for the role of vitamin D in pregnancy and perinatal outcomes A systematic review of articles published in PubMed between May 2010 and October 2011 was undertaken using key words for vitamin D and pregnancy. Seventy-eight studies were reviewed. RECENT

findingsThe biologic evidence regarding a role for vitamin D in reproductive outcomes is strong, and rates of vitamin D deficiency may be high among pregnant women. However, no consensus exists regarding optimum vitamin D levels in pregnancy or standard measurement of vitamin D deficiency. Clinical studies establishing an association between vitamin D levels and adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, low birthweight, preterm labor, cesarean delivery and infectious diseases have conflicting results. This is likely due to a paucity of randomized trials, heterogeneity of populations studied and low sample size with poor adjustment for confounding among observational studies. SUMMARY: Further research should focus on defining optimum 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels in pregnancy as well as among various subgroups of the population. Randomized trials are needed to determine whether vitamin D supplementation can improve pregnancy outcomes. Currently, the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Institute of Medicine recommend 600 IU of daily vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy to support maternal and fetal bone metabolism.

Indexed as

Reproductive HealthBone DensityDietary SupplementsFemaleHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureObstetric Labor, PrematurePregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPregnancy OutcomeSunlightUnited StatesVitamin DVitamin D Deficiency25-hydroxyvitamin DVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID22327734
PMCPMC3709246
OpenAlexW2044634062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.