Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22327555›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2012

Many mechanisms, one entrance: membrane protein translocation into the nucleus.

Nikolaj Zuleger, Alastair R W Kerr, Eric C Schirmer

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Working a second job: Cell adhesion proteins that moonlight in the nucleus.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  5. Editorial: In celebration of women in cell adhesion and migration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. GPCR signalling from within the cell.British journal of pharmacology · 2018
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nikolaj ZulegerWellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Alastair R W Kerr
Eric C Schirmer
Wellcome Centre for Cell Biology · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 092076Wellcome Trust 095209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The inner nuclear membrane harbors a unique set of membrane proteins, many of which interact with nuclear intermediate filaments and chromatin components and thus play an important role in nuclear organization and gene expression regulation. These membrane proteins have to be constantly transported into the nucleus from their sites of synthesis in the ER to match the growth of the nuclear membrane during interphase. Many mechanisms have evolved to enable translocation of these proteins to the nucleus. The full range of mechanisms goes from rare autophagy events to regulated translocation using the nuclear pore complexes. Though mechanisms involving nuclear pores are predominant, within this group an enormous mechanistic range is observed from free diffusion through the peripheral channels to many distinct mechanisms involving different nucleoporins and other components of the soluble protein transport machinery in the central channels. This review aims to provide a comprehensive insight into this mechanistic diversity.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalModels, MolecularActive Transport, Cell NucleusCell NucleusEndoplasmic ReticulumMembrane ProteinsNuclear PoreMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22327555
PMCPMC11114554
OpenAlexW2018626241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.