Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22327549›Full record

ReviewForschende Komplementarmedizin (2006)2012

State-space grid analysis: applications for clinical whole systems complementary and alternative medicine research.

Amy Howerter, Tom Hollenstein, Heather Boon, Kathryn Niemeyer, David Brule

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Forschende Komplementarmedizin (2006), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Whole Systems Research Methods in Health Care: A Scoping Review.Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) · 2019
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. A complex, nonlinear dynamic systems perspective on Ayurveda and Ayurvedic research.Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) · 2012
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amy HowerterDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85719-5052, USA. howerter@email.arizona.edu
Tom Hollenstein
Heather Boon
Kathryn Niemeyer
David Brule

Funding

Arizona Complementary and Alternative Medicine Research Training ProgramT32AT001287 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI BELL, IRIS ROBERTA · 2002 to 2011
$3.2M
Creating Collaborative Relationships: Whole CAM Systems & Complexity ResearchersR13AT005189 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI KOITHAN, MARY S · 2009 to 2009
$10k
NCCIH NIH HHS R13 AT005189NCCIH NIH HHS R13 AT005189-01NCCIH NIH HHS T32 AT001287NCCIH NIH HHS T32 AT01287
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents state space grids (SSGs) as a mathematically less intensive methodology for process-oriented research beyond traditional qualitative and quantitative approaches in whole systems of complementary and alternative medicine (WS-CAM). SSGs, originally applied in developmental psychology research, offer a logical, flexible, and accessible tool for capturing emergent changes in the temporal dynamics of patient behaviors, manifestations of resilience, and outcomes. The SSG method generates a two-dimensional visualization and quantification of the inter-relationships between variables on a moment-to-moment basis. SSGs can describe dyadic interactive behavior in real time and, followed longitudinally, allow evaluation of how change occurs over extended time periods. Practice theories of WS-CAM encompass the holistic health concept of whole-person outcomes, including nonlinear pathways to complex, multidimensional changes. Understanding how the patient as a living system arrives at these outcomes requires studying the process of healing, e.g., sudden abrupt worsening and/or improvements, 'healing crises', and 'unstuckness', from which the multiple inter-personal and intra-personal outcomes emerge. SSGs can document the indirect, emergent dynamic effects of interventions, transitional phases, and the mutual interaction of patient and environment that underlie the healing process. Two WS-CAM research exemplars are provided to demonstrate the feasibility of using SSGs in both dyadic and within-patient contexts, and to illustrate the possibilities for clinically relevant, process-focused hypotheses. This type of research has the potential to help clinicians select, modify and optimize treatment plans earlier in the course of care and produce more successful outcomes for more patients.

Indexed as

Philosophy, MedicalProfessional-Patient RelationsSystems TheoryArousalBiomedical ResearchComplementary TherapiesDiseaseFeedback, PhysiologicalHumansIllness BehaviorMental HealingNonlinear DynamicsOutcome and Process Assessment, Health Care

Identifiers

PMID22327549
PMCPMC4720125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.