Trial reportNature neuroscience2012
The integration of motion and disparity cues to depth in dorsal visual cortex.
Trial report in Nature neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
66 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conjunctions between motion and disparity are encoded with the same spatial resolution as disparity alone.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012Trial
- Learning new perceptual skills: Individual differences in the computations that integrate novel sensory cues into depth perception.iScience · 2026Article
- Article
- Effects of Perceptual Learning Through Binocular Virtual Reality Exercises on Low Stereopsis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Human and artificial visual systems share a computational principle for transforming binocular disparity into depth representation.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Characterizing Human Disparity Tuning Properties Using Population Receptive Field Mapping.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Towards Human Sensory Augmentation: A Cognitive Neuroscience Framework for Evaluating Integration of New Signals within Perception, Brain Representations, and Subjective Experience.Augmented human research · 2025Article
- Building egocentric models of local space from retinal input.Current biology : CB · 2024Review
- The effect of different depth planes during a manual tracking task in three-dimensional virtual reality space.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Different types of uncertainty in multisensory perceptual decision making.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Review
- Identifying cortical areas that underlie the transformation from 2D retinal to 3D head-centric motion signals.NeuroImage · 2023Article
- Internal biases are linked to disrupted cue combination in children and adults.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- Effect of Impaired Stereoscopic Vision on Large-Scale Resting-State Functional Network Connectivity in Comitant Exotropia Patients.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Abnormal effective connectivity in visual cortices underlies stereopsis defects in amblyopia.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2022Article
- Human primary visual cortex shows larger population receptive fields for binocular disparity-defined stimuli.Brain structure & function · 2021Article
- Merging familiar and new senses to perceive and act in space.Cognitive processing · 2021Article
- Disparity in Context: Understanding how monocular image content interacts with disparity processing in human visual cortex.NeuroImage · 2021Article
- Behavioral and Neural Fusion of Expectation with Sensation.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2021Article
- Young children combine sensory cues with learned information in a statistically efficient manner: But task complexity matters.Developmental science · 2020Article
- Integration of Motion and Form Cues for the Perception of Self-Motion in the Human Brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020Article
6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humans exploit a range of visual depth cues to estimate three-dimensional structure. For example, the slant of a nearby tabletop can be judged by combining information from binocular disparity, texture and perspective. Behavioral tests show humans combine cues near-optimally, a feat that could depend on discriminating the outputs from cue-specific mechanisms or on fusing signals into a common representation. Although fusion is computationally attractive, it poses a substantial challenge, requiring the integration of quantitatively different signals. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to provide evidence that dorsal visual area V3B/KO meets this challenge. Specifically, we found that fMRI responses are more discriminable when two cues (binocular disparity and relative motion) concurrently signal depth, and that information provided by one cue is diagnostic of depth indicated by the other. This suggests a cortical node important when perceiving depth, and highlights computations based on fusion in the dorsal stream.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.